Suppr超能文献

女性安全心理健康服务护理路径中的社会氛围:随安全级别、患者动机、治疗联盟及紊乱程度的变化

Social climate along the pathway of care in women's secure mental health service: variation with level of security, patient motivation, therapeutic alliance and level of disturbance.

作者信息

Long C G, Anagnostakis K, Fox E, Silaule P, Somers J, West R, Webster A

机构信息

St. Andrews Healthcare, Northampton, UK.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Jul;21(3):202-14. doi: 10.1002/cbm.791. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social climate has been measured in a variety of therapeutic settings, but there is little information about it in secure mental health services, or how it may vary along a gender specific care pathway.

AIM

To assess social climate in women's secure wards and its variation by level of security and ward type, therapeutic alliance, patient motivation, treatment engagement and disturbed behaviour.

METHOD

Three-quarters (80, 76%) of staff and nearly all (65, 92%) of patients in the two medium-security wards and two low-security wards that comprised the unit completed the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) and the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS); patients also completed the Patient Motivation Inventory (PMI). Pre-assessment levels of disturbed behaviour and treatment engagement were recorded.

RESULTS

Social climate varied according to ward type and level of security. EssenCES ratings indicative of positive social climate were associated with lower levels of security; such ratings were also associated with lower behavioural disturbance and with higher levels of motivation, treatment engagement and therapeutic alliance.

CONCLUSION

This serial cross-sectional survey indicated that use of the EssenCES alone might be a good practical measure of treatment progress/responsivity. A longitudinal study would be an important next step in establishing the extent to which it would be useful in this regard.

摘要

背景

社会氛围已在多种治疗环境中得到测量,但在安全型心理健康服务机构中,关于社会氛围的信息较少,也不清楚它在特定性别护理路径中会如何变化。

目的

评估女性安全病房中的社会氛围,以及其在安全级别、病房类型、治疗联盟、患者动机、治疗参与度和行为紊乱方面的差异。

方法

该单位的两个中等安全级病房和两个低安全级病房中,四分之三(80名,占76%)的工作人员以及几乎所有(65名,占92%)的患者完成了埃森气候评估量表(EssenCES)和加利福尼亚心理治疗联盟量表(CALPAS);患者还完成了患者动机量表(PMI)。记录了评估前的行为紊乱水平和治疗参与度。

结果

社会氛围因病房类型和安全级别而异。表明积极社会氛围的埃森气候评估量表评分与较低的安全级别相关;此类评分还与较低的行为紊乱水平以及较高的动机、治疗参与度和治疗联盟水平相关。

结论

这项系列横断面调查表明,仅使用埃森气候评估量表可能是衡量治疗进展/反应性的一个很好的实用指标。纵向研究将是确定其在这方面有用程度的重要下一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验