• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EssenCES,一份用于评估法医精神科病房社会氛围的简短问卷。

EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards.

作者信息

Schalast Norbert, Redies Mirja, Collins Mick, Stacey Jacqueline, Howells Kevin

机构信息

Institute of Forensic Psychiatry, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2008;18(1):49-58. doi: 10.1002/cbm.677.

DOI:10.1002/cbm.677
PMID:18229876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A supportive ward atmosphere is considered by many to be a precondition for successful treatment in forensic psychiatry, but there is a clear need for a valid and economic climate evaluation instrument.

AIMS

To validate a short questionnaire, designed for assessing forensic psychiatric wards. Climate dimensions measured with the 'Essen Climate Evaluation Schema' (EssenCES) are 'Therapeutic Hold', 'Patients' Cohesion and Mutual Support' and 'Safety' (versus threat of aggression and violence).

METHOD

In 17 forensic mental hospitals in Germany, patients and staff completed the EssenCES and other questionnaires. Problematic events were recorded over a period of 3 weeks on each ward.

RESULTS

The anticipated three factor structure of the instrument was confirmed. The pattern of correlations also provided support for the validity of the subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The climate questionnaire is an economic and valid instrument for assessing the ward atmosphere in forensic psychiatry. Findings from a pilot study in England give confidence to the structural validity of the English version too.

摘要

背景

许多人认为支持性的病房氛围是法医精神病学成功治疗的前提条件,但显然需要一种有效且经济的氛围评估工具。

目的

验证一份为评估法医精神病房而设计的简短问卷。用“埃森氛围评估量表”(EssenCES)测量的氛围维度包括“治疗掌控”、“患者凝聚力与相互支持”以及“安全”(与攻击和暴力威胁相对)。

方法

在德国的17家法医精神病医院,患者和工作人员完成了埃森氛围评估量表及其他问卷。在每个病房记录为期3周的问题事件。

结果

该工具预期的三因素结构得到证实。相关性模式也为各子量表的有效性提供了支持。

结论

氛围问卷是评估法医精神病学病房氛围的一种经济且有效的工具。在英国进行的一项试点研究结果也让人们对英文版的结构效度充满信心。

相似文献

1
EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards.EssenCES,一份用于评估法医精神科病房社会氛围的简短问卷。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2008;18(1):49-58. doi: 10.1002/cbm.677.
2
[A short questionnaire for assessing the social climate on forensic psychiatric wards].[一份用于评估法医精神科病房社会氛围的简短问卷]
Psychiatr Prax. 2008 May;35(4):175-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970960. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) in a Sample of General Psychiatric Wards.埃森气候评估量表(EssenCES)在普通精神科病房样本中的心理测量特性。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Factor structure of the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema measure of social climate in a UK medium-security setting.英国中等安全级环境下社会气候的埃森气候评估量表的因子结构。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):86-99. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1878. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
5
The EssenCES measure of social climate: a preliminary validation and normative data in UK high secure hospital settings.埃森社会气候评估量表:英国高度戒备医院环境中的初步验证及常模数据
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2009;19(5):308-20. doi: 10.1002/cbm.745.
6
Ward atmosphere in acute psychiatric inpatient care: differences and similarities between patient and staff perceptions.急性精神科住院护理中的病房氛围:患者与工作人员认知的差异与相似之处
Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(3):215-20. doi: 10.1080/08039480310001382.
7
Can a focused staff training programme improve the ward atmosphere and patient satisfaction in a forensic psychiatric hospital? A pilot study.一项针对性的员工培训计划能否改善法医精神病医院的病房氛围和患者满意度?一项试点研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Mar;23(1):117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00597.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
8
A revised Swedish version of the Ward Atmosphere Scale: usability and psychometrics.《病房氛围量表》瑞典语修订版:可用性与心理测量学
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;64(5):303-9. doi: 10.3109/08039480903524913.
9
[Comparison of ward atmosphere between three specialized wards for patients with alcoholism, schizophrenia, and depression and a diagnostic heterogeneous satellite ward].[酗酒、精神分裂症和抑郁症患者的三个专科病房与一个诊断异质性卫星病房的病房氛围比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2003 May;30(4):192-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39491.
10
[The impact of mental disorders on quality of life perceived by patients discharged from a security psychiatric hospital].[精神障碍对从安全精神病医院出院患者所感知生活质量的影响]
Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring patient satisfaction with mental health services in correctional settings: a systematic scoping review.测量惩教机构中患者对心理健康服务的满意度:一项系统性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 14;16:1575157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1575157. eCollection 2025.
2
Safety First! Residential Group Climate and Antisocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-analysis.安全第一!住宅群体气候与反社会行为:一项多层次荟萃分析。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Sep;69(12):1663-1687. doi: 10.1177/0306624X241252052. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Motiv8: a study protocol for a cluster-randomised feasibility trial of a weight management intervention for adults with severe mental illness in secure forensic services.
Motiv8:一项关于为安全法医服务机构中患有严重精神疾病的成年人开展体重管理干预的整群随机可行性试验的研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Mar 2;10(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01458-8.
4
Mandatory substance use treatment for justice-involved persons in Germany: a systematic review of reoffending, treatment and the recurrence of substance use outcomes.德国针对涉司法人员的强制药物使用治疗:对再犯罪、治疗及药物使用结果复发情况的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 5;14:1217561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1217561. eCollection 2023.
5
Measuring Experience of Inpatient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).测量住院儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 24;20(11):5940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20115940.
6
Quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress for older forensic mental health patients: a qualitative investigation based on the perspectives of patients and staff.老年法医精神健康患者的生活质量、幸福感、康复和进展:基于患者和工作人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2202978. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2202978.
7
The SECURE STAIRS Framework: Preliminary Evaluation of Trauma Informed Training Developments Within the Children and Young People's Secure Estate.安全楼梯框架:儿童和青少年安全场所创伤知情培训发展的初步评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Aug;59(6):1129-1135. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01092-3. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Interventions to Improve Social Climate in Acute Mental Health Inpatient Settings: Systematic Review of Content and Outcomes.改善急性精神卫生住院环境社会氛围的干预措施:内容与结果的系统评价
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Dec 12;8:23779608221124291. doi: 10.1177/23779608221124291. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
See think act scale: Validation of the Dutch version of a measure of relational security in high secure forensic psychiatric care.观察-思考-行动量表:荷兰版高安全级法医精神病护理中关系安全感测量工具的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 3;13:1020718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1020718. eCollection 2022.
10
Prospective cohort study of the evaluation of patient benefit from the redevelopment of a complete national forensic mental health service: the Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study (D-FOREST) protocol.前瞻性队列研究评估重新开发完整的国家法医精神卫生服务为患者带来的获益:邓德拉姆法医重建评估研究(D-FOREST)方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 22;12(7):e058581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058581.