Suppr超能文献

冷空气镇痛作为光动力疗法治疗光化性角化病时的疼痛缓解方法。

Cold air analgesia as pain reduction during photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jul;26(7):849-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04167.x. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratoses and non-melanoma skin cancer. The main side effect of PDT is pain during the illumination.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of cold air as pain relief during MAL-PDT for field cancerization on different body areas.

METHODS

A prospective, open, intra-individual right-left comparison study was performed in 43 patients with MAL-PDT as field cancerization. One area received cold air analgesia while the other did not. Pain was evaluated by numeric rating scale (NRS) during the illumination. The patients' received a questionnaire and recorded pain and postinflammatory symptoms on a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

We found a statistical significant difference in overall pain score at 3 and 9 minutes. The area receiving cold air during illumination had a mean NRS of 5.1 while the opposite side, not receiving cold air, had NRS of 6.1. At 9 minutes the side receiving cold air had mean NRS of 5.0, and the side without had 5.7. The pain difference on the chest was the most pronounced with a NRS of 5.2 without air and 3.5 with cold air. There was a significant difference in erythema immediately after, 1 h and 24 h after illumination.

LIMITATIONS

Small, open, not blinded study. The difference in pain was small.

CONCLUSION

Cold air is an effective method for moderate pain relief. It is an easy, noninvasive method that can be used on all body parts.

摘要

背景

光动力疗法(PDT)是治疗光化性角化病和非黑素瘤皮肤癌的有效方法。PDT 的主要副作用是光照过程中的疼痛。

目的

评估在多病灶性光化性角化病中使用冷气流作为 MAL-PDT 缓解疼痛的效果,该方法适用于不同身体部位。

方法

对 43 例多病灶性光化性角化病患者进行了前瞻性、开放、个体内左右对比研究。一个区域接受冷气流镇痛,另一个区域不接受。在光照过程中通过数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛。患者收到问卷,并在视觉模拟量表(VAS)上记录疼痛和炎症后症状。

结果

我们发现,在 3 分钟和 9 分钟时,整体疼痛评分存在统计学显著差异。接受光照时使用冷气流的区域平均 NRS 为 5.1,而未使用冷气流的对侧区域 NRS 为 6.1。在 9 分钟时,接受冷气流的区域平均 NRS 为 5.0,未接受冷气流的区域为 5.7。胸部的疼痛差异最为明显,不使用冷气流时 NRS 为 5.2,使用冷气流时为 3.5。在光照后即刻、1 小时和 24 小时,红斑的差异均具有统计学意义。

局限性

规模小、开放性、非盲法研究。疼痛差异较小。

结论

冷气流是中度疼痛缓解的有效方法。它是一种简单、无创的方法,可用于所有身体部位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验