• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与氯吡格雷相比,高血小板反应患者停用替格瑞洛治疗后血小板功能更早恢复。

Earlier recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with high antiplatelet responses.

机构信息

NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit and Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Sep;9(9):1730-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04419.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04419.x
PMID:21707911
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rate of recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of P2Y(12) inhibitors depends on the reversibility of the antiplatelet effect and the extent of the on-treatment response. P2Y(12) inhibition increases the bleeding risk in patients requiring surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with high levels of platelet inhibition (HPI) during the ONSET/OFFSET study.

METHODS

Patients received aspirin 75-100 mg per day and either ticagrelor 90 mg twice-daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily for 6 weeks. This subanalysis included patients with HPI after the last dose of maintenance therapy, defined as: inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) > 75% 4 h post-dose (ADP 20 μm, final extent); < 120 P2Y(12) reaction units 8 h post-dose (VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay); or platelet reactivity index < 50% 8 h post-dose (VASP-P assay).

RESULTS

IPA > 75% was observed in 39 out of 47 ticagrelor-treated and 17 out of 44 clopidogrel-treated patients. The rate of offset of IPA over 4-72 h was greater with ticagrelor (IPA %/hour slope: -1.11 vs. -0.67 for clopidogrel; P < 0.0001). Mean IPA was significantly lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel between 48 and 168 h post-dose (P < 0.01). Similar findings were observed with the other assays. The average time for IPA to decline from 30% to 10% was 50.8 h with ticagrelor vs. 110.4 h with clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HPI, recovery of platelet function was more rapid after discontinuation of ticagrelor than clopidogrel leading to significantly greater platelet reactivity by 48 h after the last dose in the ticagrelor group.

摘要

背景

血小板功能在停止使用 P2Y(12)抑制剂后恢复的速度取决于抗血小板作用的可逆性和治疗反应的程度。P2Y(12)抑制会增加需要手术的患者的出血风险。

目的

在 ONSET/OFFSET 研究中,评估稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中高血小板抑制(HPI)患者停用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷后血小板功能的恢复情况。

方法

患者每日接受阿司匹林 75-100mg,同时接受替格瑞洛 90mg 每日两次或氯吡格雷 75mg 每日一次治疗 6 周。该亚组分析包括维持治疗最后一剂后 HPI 的患者,定义为:血小板聚集抑制(IPA)> 4 小时后> 75%(ADP 20μm,最终程度);8 小时后< 120 P2Y(12)反应单位(VerifyNow P2Y(12)测定法);或 8 小时后血小板反应指数< 50%(VASP-P 测定法)。

结果

在 47 例接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者中有 39 例和 44 例接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者中有 17 例观察到 IPA > 75%。4-72 小时 IPA 消退率高于替格瑞洛(IPA%/小时斜率:替格瑞洛为-1.11,氯吡格雷为-0.67;P<0.0001)。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛在 48-168 小时后 IPA 明显更低(P<0.01)。其他检测方法也有类似的发现。IPA 从 30%降至 10%的平均时间为替格瑞洛 50.8 小时,氯吡格雷 110.4 小时。

结论

在 HPI 患者中,停用替格瑞洛后血小板功能恢复较快,与氯吡格雷相比,在替格瑞洛组最后一剂后 48 小时时血小板反应性显著增加。

相似文献

1
Earlier recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with high antiplatelet responses. 与氯吡格雷相比,高血小板反应患者停用替格瑞洛治疗后血小板功能更早恢复。
J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Sep;9(9):1730-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04419.x.
2
Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study.随机双盲评估替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的抗血小板作用的起效和失效:ONSET/OFFSET 研究。
Circulation. 2009 Dec 22;120(25):2577-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.912550. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
3
Comparison of pharmacodynamics between low dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel after loading and maintenance doses in healthy Korean subjects.韩国健康受试者在负荷剂量和维持剂量后低剂量替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的药效学比较。
Platelets. 2015;26(6):563-9. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.959913. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
4
Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with high on-clopidogrel treatment platelet reactivity after PCI: The ISAR-ADAPT-PF study.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷用于PCI术后氯吡格雷治疗时血小板高反应性患者的疗效比较:ISAR-ADAPT-PF研究
Platelets. 2016 Dec;27(8):796-804. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1190007. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
5
Effects of P2Y12 receptor inhibition with or without aspirin on hemostatic system activation: a randomized trial in healthy subjects.P2Y12 受体抑制联合或不联合阿司匹林对止血系统激活的影响:一项在健康受试者中的随机试验。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Feb;14(2):273-81. doi: 10.1111/jth.13216. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
6
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary artery disease: results from the ONSET-OFFSET and RESPOND studies.替格瑞洛在稳定性冠心病患者中的药代动力学和药效学:来自 ONSET-OFFSET 和 RESPOND 研究的结果。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Jun 1;51(6):397-409. doi: 10.2165/11599830-000000000-00000.
7
Comparison of the Antiplatelet Effects of Once and Twice Daily Low-Dose Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后每日一次和每日两次低剂量替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Platelet reactivity after receiving clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor in patients with kidney failure treated with hemodialysis: a randomized crossover study.接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者与接受透析治疗的肾衰竭患者相比,血小板反应性与替格瑞洛:一项随机交叉研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):916-24. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
9
Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Troponin-Negative Patients With Low-Risk ACS Undergoing Ad Hoc PCI.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的低危 ACS 且肌钙蛋白阴性患者的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 16;67(6):603-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.044.
10
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Black Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Pilot Study.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于稳定型冠心病黑人患者的前瞻性、随机、开放标签、多剂量、交叉试验研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002232.

引用本文的文献

1
GPD2 inhibition impairs coagulation function via ROS/NF-κB/P2Y12 pathway.GPD2抑制通过ROS/NF-κB/P2Y12途径损害凝血功能。
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025 Jul 18;30(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00759-x.
2
Ticagrelor inverse agonist activity at the P2Y receptor is non-reversible versus its endogenous agonist adenosine 5´-diphosphate.替格瑞洛对 P2Y 受体的反向激动剂活性与内源性激动剂腺苷 5´-二磷酸相比是非可逆的。
Br J Pharmacol. 2024 Jan;181(1):21-35. doi: 10.1111/bph.16204. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
The Impact of FEV1/FVC Ratio on the Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Dual Anti-Platelet Agents.
第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量比值对接受双联抗血小板药物治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者临床结局的影响
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):116-126. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220601A.
4
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Analysis From a Multicenter Registry.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心注册研究的治疗中分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 27;9:887748. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.887748. eCollection 2022.
5
P2Y12 blocker monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用P2Y12受体阻滞剂单药治疗。
Neth Heart J. 2021 Nov;29(11):566-576. doi: 10.1007/s12471-021-01582-7. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies for left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置的抗血小板和抗凝策略。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):521. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4849.
7
New Antithrombotic Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中的新型抗血栓药物
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 30;9(7):2059. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072059.
8
Novel Antiplatelet Perioperative Bridging Protocol for Lung Lobectomy: A Case Report.肺叶切除术的新型抗血小板围手术期桥接方案:病例报告
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18.119. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
9
GLS-409, an Antagonist of Both P2Y and P2Y, Potently Inhibits Canine Coronary Artery Thrombosis and Reversibly Inhibits Human Platelet Activation.GLS-409,一种 P2Y 和 P2Y 的双重拮抗剂,能有效抑制犬冠状动脉血栓形成,并能可逆性抑制人血小板活化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 28;8(1):14529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32797-1.
10
The effect of cessation of 2nd generation PY inhibitor therapy on platelet reactivity in patients 1 year after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后 1 年停止第二代 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗对血小板反应性的影响。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Oct;46(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1701-7.