Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, 100 Jabutinski St, 98100, Petach Tikva, Israel.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Oct;46(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1701-7.
To assess the effect of cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens containing 2nd generation PY inhibitors on platelet reactivity, in patients who completed 12 months of DAPT following an acute myocardial infarction. Clinical data has shown an increased cardiovascular risk in the 90 days following cessation of DAPT. One possible explanation is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of treatment. Data from patients treated with 2nd generation PY inhibitors is scarce. Patients who completed 12 month DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor underwent serial assessment of platelet reactivity (on DAPT and 1, 4 and 12 weeks post cessation). The primary outcome was platelet reactivity, expressed as platelet reactivity units (PRU) at each time point. 41 participants were included in this study, (23 ticagrelor, 18 prasugrel). There was no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between prasugrel/ticagrelor treated patients . The pattern of platelet reactivity recovery after DAPT cessation differed between the ticagrelor and prasugrel: with ticagrelor, after the initial PRU increase from baseline, the PRU remained stable, while with prasugrel, there was a further increase in PRU between 1 and 4 weeks, with a return to the 1 week level by 12 weeks (p = 0.034 for the time × treatment interaction between ticagrelor and prasugrel). Our results suggest there is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of ADP receptor blockers therapy with prasugrel, but not ticagrelor. Further research is required to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind these findings and to evaluate potential strategies to prevent or overcome this "rebound" effect.
评估急性心肌梗死后接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)方案治疗 12 个月后停止使用第二代 P2Y12 抑制剂对血小板反应性的影响。临床数据显示,DAPT 停药后 90 天内心血管风险增加。一种可能的解释是治疗停止后血小板一过性高反应性。接受第二代 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗的患者数据很少。接受普拉格雷/替格瑞洛治疗并完成 12 个月 DAPT 的患者进行了血小板反应性的连续评估(在 DAPT 及停药后 1、4 和 12 周)。主要结局是每个时间点的血小板反应性,用血小板反应单位(PRU)表示。本研究纳入了 41 名患者(替格瑞洛 23 例,普拉格雷 18 例)。普拉格雷/替格瑞洛治疗患者的基线特征无统计学差异。DAPT 停药后血小板反应恢复模式在替格瑞洛和普拉格雷之间存在差异:替格瑞洛组在基线 PRU 初始增加后,PRU 保持稳定,而普拉格雷组在 1 至 4 周之间 PRU 进一步增加,在 12 周时恢复至 1 周水平(替格瑞洛和普拉格雷之间时间治疗相互作用的 p 值=0.034)。我们的结果表明,普拉格雷而非替格瑞洛停止使用 ADP 受体阻滞剂治疗后存在一过性血小板高反应性。需要进一步研究阐明这些发现背后的病理生理机制,并评估预防或克服这种“反弹”效应的潜在策略。