CIRAD, UMR Contrôle des maladies, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Parasit Vectors. 2011 Jun 27;4:119. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-119.
The emergence and massive spread of bluetongue in Western Europe during 2006-2008 had disastrous consequences for sheep and cattle production and confirmed the ability of Palaearctic Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to transmit the virus. Some aspects of Culicoides ecology, especially host-seeking and feeding behaviors, remain insufficiently described due to the difficulty of collecting them directly on a bait animal, the most reliable method to evaluate biting rates.Our aim was to compare typical animal-baited traps (drop trap and direct aspiration) to both a new sticky cover trap and a UV-light/suction trap (the most commonly used method to collect Culicoides).
METHODS/RESULTS: Collections were made from 1.45 hours before sunset to 1.45 hours after sunset in June/July 2009 at an experimental sheep farm (INRA, Nouzilly, Western France), with 3 replicates of a 4 sites×4 traps randomized Latin square using one sheep per site. Collected Culicoides individuals were sorted morphologically to species, sex and physiological stages for females. Sibling species were identified using a molecular assay. A total of 534 Culicoides belonging to 17 species was collected. Abundance was maximal in the drop trap (232 females and 4 males from 10 species) whereas the diversity was the highest in the UV-light/suction trap (136 females and 5 males from 15 species). Significant between-trap differences abundance and parity rates were observed.
Only the direct aspiration collected exclusively host-seeking females, despite a concern that human manipulation may influence estimation of the biting rate. The sticky cover trap assessed accurately the biting rate of abundant species even if it might act as an interception trap. The drop trap collected the highest abundance of Culicoides and may have caught individuals not attracted by sheep but by its structure. Finally, abundances obtained using the UV-light/suction trap did not estimate accurately Culicoides biting rate.
2006-2008 年,西歐藍舌病的爆發和大規模蔓延給羊和牛的生產帶來了災難性的後果,並證實了北極圈蠓科(雙翅目:蠓科)傳播病毒的能力。由於直接在誘餌動物上收集蠓科昆蟲的困難,蠓科昆蟲生態學的某些方面,尤其是尋找和進食行為,仍未得到充分描述,這是評估叮咬率最可靠的方法。我們的目的是比較典型的動物誘餌陷阱(降落陷阱和直接抽吸)與新的粘性覆蓋陷阱和紫外光/抽吸陷阱(收集蠓科最常用的方法)。
方法/結果:2009 年 6 月/7 月,在法國西部 INRA 的一個實驗性養羊場,日落前 1.45 小時至日落後 1.45 小時期間,每個地點使用一隻羊,在 4 個地點×4 個陷阱的 3 個重複拉丁方中,使用 3 種不同的方法收集昆蟲。收集到的蠓科昆蟲根據形態學分為物種、性別和雌性的生理階段。同卵種用分子檢測方法鑑定。共收集到 534 隻屬於 17 個物種的蠓科昆蟲。降落陷阱中的數量最多(232 隻雌性和 4 隻雄性,來自 10 個物種),而紫外光/抽吸陷阱中的多樣性最高(136 隻雌性和 5 隻雄性,來自 15 個物種)。觀察到不同陷阱之間在豐度和性成熟率上存在顯著差異。
只有直接抽吸能收集到完全尋找宿主的雌性蠓科昆蟲,盡管人為操作可能會影響叮咬率的估計。粘性覆蓋陷阱即使可能作為截留陷阱,也能準確評估豐富物種的叮咬率。降落陷阱收集到的蠓科昆蟲數量最多,可能捕獲了不是被羊吸引而是被其結構吸引的個體。最後,紫外光/抽吸陷阱收集到的昆蟲數量不能準確估計蠓科昆蟲的叮咬率。