Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Dec;135(1-3):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
Reduced social rhythmicity is a commonly reported feature of bipolar disorder which may extend to non-clinical populations at risk of bipolar disorder. The aim of the current study was to investigate social rhythms across three groups of participants; a clinical group of bipolar disorder outpatients, and two non-clinical groups with high- and low-vulnerability to bipolar disorder, respectively. It was expected that reduced social rhythmicity would differentiate the clinical group from the low-vulnerability group, but not the high vulnerability group.
Non-clinical participants were selected on the basis of scores derived from the General Behaviour Inventory and allocated to groups of high (n=36) and low (n=36) trait vulnerability to bipolar disorder. The clinical group (n=15) were volunteers recruited from an outpatient clinic. Participants completed a self-report social rhythmicity measure daily for seven consecutive days.
One-way analysis of covariance (age) showed a significant overall effect for group, F (2,83)=4.67, p<.05. Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in social rhythms between the two nonclinical groups only.
The cross-sectional design of the study limits the strength of conclusions that can be drawn.
The hypothesis was only partially supported. Consistent with expectations, the non-clinical group with higher vulnerability to bipolar disorder recorded lower social rhythmicity than the non-clinical group with lower vulnerability to bipolar disorder. The clinical group however, did not differ in social rhythmicity from the lower vulnerability group. The findings may have consequences for the way in which vulnerability to bipolar disorder is managed.
社会节奏的降低是双相情感障碍的一个常见特征,这种情况可能会扩展到具有双相情感障碍风险的非临床人群中。本研究的目的是调查三个组别的社会节奏:一组是双相情感障碍门诊患者的临床组,另外两组分别是具有高和低双相情感障碍易感性的非临床组。预计社会节奏的降低将使临床组与低易感性组区分开来,但不会与高易感性组区分开。
根据一般行为量表的得分,选择非临床参与者,并将他们分配到具有高(n=36)和低(n=36)双相情感障碍易感性的两组。临床组(n=15)是从门诊诊所招募的志愿者。参与者在连续七天内每天完成一份自我报告的社会节奏测量。
单向方差分析(年龄)显示,组间存在显著的整体效应,F(2,83)=4.67,p<.05。事后比较显示,只有两个非临床组之间的社会节奏存在显著差异。
该研究的横断面设计限制了可以得出的结论的强度。
假设仅得到部分支持。与预期一致,具有较高双相情感障碍易感性的非临床组的社会节奏低于具有较低双相情感障碍易感性的非临床组。然而,临床组与较低易感性组在社会节奏方面没有差异。这些发现可能会对管理双相情感障碍易感性的方式产生影响。