Meyer Thomas D, Maier Silke
Department of Clinical and Physiological Psychology, Eberhard Karls University, Psychological Institute, Christophstrasse 2, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Jan 30;141(1):103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.023. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
Social rhythm disruptions are thought to be related to the etiology of affective symptoms. 'Hypomanic personality' and 'rigidity' are hypothesized to be risk factors for affective disorders. We examined whether people scoring high on such scales would demonstrate instability of social rhythms and sleep. In a short-term prospective diary study with one group factor, the following three groups were selected from a non-university student sample: 'bipolar risk' (scoring high on the 'Hypomanic Personality Scale'; n=56); 'Unipolar risk' (scoring high on the 'Rigidity Scale'; n=37); and a control group (scoring low on both scales; n=48). The participants completed ratings of their activities and sleep for 28 days. People at risk for bipolar disorders showed a lower regularity of daily activities than controls. Their sleeping pattern was not characterized by fewer but by more variable hours of sleep. The unipolar risk group did not differ from the control group at all. Despite some limitations, there is partial evidence for social rhythm and sleep irregularities in people putatively at risk for bipolar disorders. Further research is, however, needed to replicate and extend these results.
社会节奏紊乱被认为与情感症状的病因有关。“轻躁狂人格”和“僵化”被假设为情感障碍的风险因素。我们研究了在这些量表上得分高的人是否会表现出社会节奏和睡眠的不稳定性。在一项具有一个组因素的短期前瞻性日记研究中,从非大学生样本中选取了以下三组:“双相情感障碍风险组”(在“轻躁狂人格量表”上得分高;n = 56);“单相情感障碍风险组”(在“僵化量表”上得分高;n = 37);以及一个对照组(在两个量表上得分低;n = 48)。参与者对他们28天的活动和睡眠进行评分。双相情感障碍风险人群的日常活动规律性低于对照组。他们的睡眠模式并非睡眠时间更少,而是睡眠时间更不稳定。单相情感障碍风险组与对照组没有任何差异。尽管存在一些局限性,但有部分证据表明疑似双相情感障碍风险人群存在社会节奏和睡眠不规律的情况。然而,需要进一步的研究来重复和扩展这些结果。