• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[经胸腔镜和腹腔镜行食管癌切除术并经胸骨后途径行圆形吻合器颈部食管胃吻合术患者的生活质量]

[Quality of life in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route].

作者信息

Wang Yu-bing, Cai Rui-jun, Han Ya-juan, Wang Wu-jun, Yang Xi-yao, Liu Su-e

机构信息

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;14(6):428-31.

PMID:21713702
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) in patients with esophageal carcinoma after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route or three-incision open surgery.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients with middle-upper esophageal carcinoma who underwent radical surgical resection from January 2009 to October 2010 were enrolled in this study. Thirty-three patients underwent combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery and 30 three-incision open surgery. The EORTC questionnaire QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 were used to evaluate the QOL.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical data between the two groups except for anastomosis method(P>0.05). In the endoscopy group, there was one patient developed anastomotic leakage(3.0%, 1/33), 1 postoperative wound infection in the neck (3.0%, 1/33), and 1 anastomotic stricture(3.0%, 1/33). In the open group, 8 patients had anastomotic leakage (26.7%, 8/30), 2 had anastomotic stricture (6.7%, 2/30), 1 had wound infection in the neck (3.3%, 1/30), and 6 had pulmonary infection (20.0%, 6/30). All the complications were managed by conservative treatment. The two groups differed in dysphagia, food intake, pain, obstruction, dyspnea, anorexia, fatigue, financial condition, physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function and global health level and were more favorable in the endoscopy group(P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the other dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative complication rate is low after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Stapled anastomosis is associated with lower rate of anastomotic leak. QOL is better in patients following thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy as compared to those following three-incision open surgery.

摘要

目的

评估经胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术及经胸骨后途径圆形吻合器颈部食管胃吻合术或三切口开放手术治疗食管癌患者的生活质量(QOL)。

方法

本研究纳入了2009年1月至2010年10月期间接受根治性手术切除的63例中上段食管癌患者。33例患者接受了腹腔镜和胸腔镜联合手术,30例接受了三切口开放手术。采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)问卷QLQ-C30和QLQ-OES18评估生活质量。

结果

除吻合方法外,两组临床资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在内镜组,1例患者发生吻合口漏(3.0%,即1/33),1例颈部术后伤口感染(3.0%,即1/33),1例吻合口狭窄(3.0%,即1/33)。在开放组,8例患者发生吻合口漏(26.7%,即8/30),2例发生吻合口狭窄(6.7%,即2/30),1例颈部伤口感染(3.3%,即1/30),6例发生肺部感染(20.0%,即6/30)。所有并发症均采用保守治疗。两组在吞咽困难、食物摄入、疼痛、梗阻、呼吸困难、厌食、疲劳、经济状况、身体功能、角色功能、情感功能、认知功能、社会功能和总体健康水平方面存在差异,内镜组更具优势(P<0.05),而在其他维度上差异无统计学意义。

结论

胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术后并发症发生率较低。吻合器吻合与较低的吻合口漏发生率相关。与三切口开放手术相比,胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术后患者的生活质量更好。

相似文献

1
[Quality of life in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route].[经胸腔镜和腹腔镜行食管癌切除术并经胸骨后途径行圆形吻合器颈部食管胃吻合术患者的生活质量]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;14(6):428-31.
2
Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.腹腔镜联合胸腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管癌切除术:来自中国的初步经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Apr;125(8):1376-80.
3
Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.食管切除术后全机械吻合的颈段食管胃吻合术的效用:与传统吻合技术的比较
Surgery. 2004 Oct;136(4):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.032.
4
Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.三种胸段食管胃吻合技术的倾向匹配分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 May;83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.046.
5
Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.食管癌切除术后手工缝合与吻合器吻合食管胃吻合术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):681-5.
6
Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.改良双层吻合在微创食管癌手术中的应用:预防渗漏和狭窄的有效方法。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3164-3170. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4126-0.
7
A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.432 例食管切除术吻合技术的综合回顾。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.045. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
[Application of circular staplers in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection].[圆形吻合器在食管癌切除术后颈段食管胃吻合术中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;14(9):692-4.
9
[Comparison of the stapled suture with the manual suture in the application of minimally invasive esophagectomy].吻合器缝合与手工缝合在微创食管切除术应用中的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):881-3.
10
[Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[食管癌切除术后机械与手工颈部食管胃吻合术的对比分析]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012 Jun;32(6):908-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.中国微创食管癌切除术:概述。
Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:119-24. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S40667. Epub 2013 Mar 3.