• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一大型城市中心儿童哮喘药物使用模式。

Pattern of asthma medication use among children from a large urban center in Brazil.

机构信息

Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Santo Antônio de Jesus, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;68(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1092-6. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-011-1092-6
PMID:21717145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3414696/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the advances in asthma therapeutics, there are few data on the use and determinants of anti-asthmatic drugs in the general population of children. This study describes the use of asthma medications among children in the general population and in children with current asthma, living in a large urban center in Brazil.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional survey, aimed at analyzing asthma determinants, was conducted with 1,382 children aged 4-11 years, between February and May 2006, in Salvador, Brazil. At baseline, an extensive questionnaire was applied, including questions about the use of asthma medications in the last 12 months.

RESULTS

In all studied children (n = 1,382) aged 4-11 years, oral beta2-agonists were the drugs most frequently used (9.8%), followed by short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists (4.3%) and systemic corticosteroids (1.6%). Anti-asthmatic drug use was higher among males than females, and it significantly decreased with age in both genders. A total of 312 children (22.6%) reported current asthma, and 62% of them were not being treated with any anti-asthmatic drugs. Of all those who reported following a certain type of treatment, 20% used oral beta2-agonists alone; 6.1%, short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists alone; and 4.8%, a combination of both drugs. Anti-asthmatic drug use did not differ according to socioeconomic status, except for the use of inhaled beta2-agonists and systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

An overwhelming majority of asthmatic children were not using long-term medications for asthma, in particular inhaled corticosteroids, regardless of the severity of their disease. This result points to the deficiencies of the Brazilian public health system in recognizing this important pharmacological need for child care and thereby limiting the access of these children to a group of efficacious, available, and low risk therapeutic medications.

摘要

目的

尽管哮喘治疗方面取得了进步,但关于普通人群儿童中抗哮喘药物的使用和决定因素的数据很少。本研究描述了巴西一个大型城市中心普通人群儿童和当前患有哮喘儿童中哮喘药物的使用情况。

方法

2006 年 2 月至 5 月,在巴西萨尔瓦多进行了一项基于人群的横断面调查,旨在分析哮喘的决定因素。共有 1382 名 4-11 岁儿童参与,基线时应用了一份广泛的问卷,包括过去 12 个月内使用哮喘药物的情况。

结果

在所研究的所有 1382 名 4-11 岁儿童中,最常使用的药物是口服β2 激动剂(9.8%),其次是短效吸入β2 激动剂(4.3%)和全身皮质类固醇(1.6%)。男女两性中,男性使用抗哮喘药物的频率均高于女性,且两性中均随年龄增长而显著下降。共有 312 名儿童(22.6%)报告目前患有哮喘,其中 62%未使用任何抗哮喘药物治疗。在所有报告使用某种特定治疗方法的儿童中,20%单独使用口服β2 激动剂;6.1%单独使用短效吸入β2 激动剂;4.8%联合使用这两种药物。除吸入β2 激动剂和全身皮质类固醇外,抗哮喘药物的使用与社会经济地位无关。

结论

绝大多数哮喘儿童未使用长期哮喘药物治疗,特别是吸入皮质类固醇,无论其疾病严重程度如何。这一结果表明,巴西公共卫生系统在认识到儿童护理的这一重要药物需求方面存在不足,从而限制了这些儿童获得一组有效、可用且低风险的治疗药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd2/3414696/4ed74e8a58e3/228_2011_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd2/3414696/4ed74e8a58e3/228_2011_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd2/3414696/4ed74e8a58e3/228_2011_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pattern of asthma medication use among children from a large urban center in Brazil.巴西一大型城市中心儿童哮喘药物使用模式。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;68(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1092-6. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus placebo in addition to inhaled corticosteroids in children and adults with chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与安慰剂用于慢性哮喘儿童和成人并联合吸入性糖皮质激素的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005535.
3
Prescribing patterns of asthma controller therapy for children in UK primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.英国初级保健中儿童哮喘控制药物治疗的处方模式:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2010 May 14;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-10-29.
4
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
5
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults.在未使用过类固醇的成年持续性哮喘患者中,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.
6
Changing patterns of asthma medication use related to US Food and Drug Administration long-acting β2-agonist regulation from 2005-2011.2005年至2011年期间与美国食品药品监督管理局长效β2受体激动剂监管相关的哮喘药物使用模式变化
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Mar;137(3):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.057. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Oral beta2-agonist use by preschool children with asthma in East and Central Harlem, New York.纽约哈莱姆东区和中区患有哮喘的学龄前儿童使用口服β2激动剂的情况。
J Asthma. 2006 Jan-Feb;43(1):31-5. doi: 10.1080/02770900500446989.
8
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁以下儿童慢性哮喘的比较效果的系统评价和经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(20):1-174, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12200.
9
Should an inhaled corticosteroid accompany each dose of fast-acting beta2-agonist for relief of asthma symptoms?缓解哮喘症状时,每剂速效β2激动剂都应搭配吸入性糖皮质激素吗?
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2024 Jun;50:38-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2023.05.005. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
10
Pharmacological management of children's asthma in general practice: findings from a community-based cross-sectional survey in Auckland, New Zealand.新西兰奥克兰一项基于社区的横断面调查中儿童哮喘的全科药物治疗管理:研究结果
N Z Med J. 2011 Nov 25;124(1346):44-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescribing trends in and perceptions of the treatment of asthma: a survey among pulmonologists in Brazil.巴西肺科医生对哮喘治疗的处方趋势及看法:一项调查
J Bras Pneumol. 2019 Jul 29;45(5):e20190083. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190083.
2
A policy of free access to asthma medicines in Brazil: an opportunity for pharmacists to optimize asthma treatment.巴西实行哮喘药物免费准入政策:药剂师优化哮喘治疗的机遇。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Aug;35(4):510-2. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9807-7.
3
A community study of factors related to poorly controlled asthma among Brazilian urban children.

本文引用的文献

1
The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges.巴西卫生体系:历史、进展与挑战。
Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1778-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8. Epub 2011 May 9.
2
Use of long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled steroids in asthma: meta-analysis of observational studies.长效β受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素在哮喘治疗中的应用:观察性研究的荟萃分析
J Asthma. 2010 May;47(4):439-46. doi: 10.3109/02770901003605340.
3
Morbidity and mortality associated with the restrictive spirometric pattern: a longitudinal study.
巴西城市儿童哮喘控制不佳相关因素的社区研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037050. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Influence of poverty and infection on asthma in Latin America.贫困和感染对拉丁美洲哮喘的影响。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;12(2):171-8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283510967.
限制性肺通气功能障碍模式相关的发病率和死亡率:一项纵向研究。
Thorax. 2010 Jun;65(6):499-504. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.126052.
4
Prioritised research agenda for prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases.优先研究议程,以预防和控制慢性呼吸道疾病。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Nov;36(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012610. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
5
The social determinants of asthma.哮喘的社会决定因素。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Feb;35(2):239-42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00070309.
6
Drug use and associated factors in children living in poor areas.儿童药物使用及相关因素研究——贫困地区儿童调研
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Oct;43(5):768-78. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009000500005.
7
Rapid reduction in hospitalisations after an intervention to manage severe asthma.干预重症哮喘后住院人数迅速减少。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Mar;35(3):515-21. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00101009. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
8
The unbearable cost of severe asthma in underprivileged populations.贫困人群中重度哮喘难以承受的费用。
Allergy. 2009 Mar;64(3):319-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02026.x.
9
The economic impact of severe asthma to low-income families.重度哮喘对低收入家庭的经济影响。
Allergy. 2009 Mar;64(3):478-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01981.x. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
10
Asthma in Latin America: a public heath challenge and research opportunity.拉丁美洲的哮喘:一项公共卫生挑战与研究机遇。
Allergy. 2009 Jan;64(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01902.x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.