Departments of Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jul;59(7):1188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03454.x. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
To compare the efficacy of a physical activity program (Seattle Protocol for Activity (SPA)) for low-exercising older adults with that of an educational health promotion program (HP), combination treatment (SPA+HP), and routine medical care control conditions (RMC).
Single-blind, randomized controlled trial with two-by-two factorial design.
Community centers in King County, Washington, from November 2001 to September 2004.
Two hundred seventy-three community-residing, cognitively intact older adults (mean age 79.2; 62% women).
SPA (in-class exercises with assistance setting weekly home exercise goals) and HP (information about age-appropriate topics relevant to enhancing health), with randomization to four conditions: SPA only (n=69), HP only (n=73), SPA+HP (n=67), and RMC control (n=64). Active-treatment participants attended nine group classes over 3 months followed by five booster sessions over 1 year.
Self-rated health (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey) and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale). Secondary ratings of physical performance, treatment adherence, and self-rated health and affective function were also collected.
At 3 months, participants in SPA exercised more and had significantly better self-reported health, strength, and general well-being (P<.05) than participants in HP or RMC. Over 18 months, SPA participants maintained health and physical function benefits and had continued to exercise more than non-SPA participants. SPA+HP was not significantly better than SPA alone. Better adherence was associated with better outcomes.
Older adults participating in low levels of regular exercise can establish and maintain a home-based exercise program that yields immediate and long-term physical and affective benefits.
比较体育活动方案(西雅图活动方案(SPA))对低运动量老年人群的疗效与健康教育促进方案(HP)、联合治疗(SPA+HP)和常规医疗照护对照条件(RMC)的疗效。
采用单盲、随机对照试验,采用两因素两水平析因设计。
2001 年 11 月至 2004 年 9 月,华盛顿州金县社区中心。
273 名居住在社区、认知完整的老年人(平均年龄 79.2 岁;62%为女性)。
SPA(有辅助的课堂练习,设定每周家庭锻炼目标)和 HP(与增强健康相关的适宜年龄主题信息),随机分为四个条件:仅 SPA(n=69)、仅 HP(n=73)、SPA+HP(n=67)和 RMC 对照(n=64)。接受积极治疗的参与者参加了 3 个月的 9 次小组课程,然后参加了 1 年的 5 次强化课程。
自我评估健康(医疗结果研究 36 项简短式健康调查)和抑郁(老年抑郁量表)。还收集了身体表现、治疗依从性以及自我评估健康和情感功能的次要评分。
在 3 个月时,与 HP 或 RMC 相比,参加 SPA 的参与者运动量更大,自我报告的健康、力量和整体幸福感明显更好(P<.05)。在 18 个月期间,SPA 参与者保持了健康和身体功能的益处,并且继续比非 SPA 参与者进行更多的锻炼。SPA+HP 并不显著优于 SPA 单独治疗。更好的依从性与更好的结果相关。
低运动量的老年人群可以建立和维持家庭锻炼方案,这会带来即时和长期的身体和情感益处。