Physical Exercise for Healthy Older Adults and Those with Frailty: What Exercise Is Best and Is There a Difference? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

METHODS

All English studies published after 1989 with a controlled design, investigating    65 years and over were considered if the study design compared PE to a nonexercise control group. Health-related outcomes included physical, cognitive, and psychological function. Studies that investigated cardiorespiratory disease and used designs like systematic review were excluded. . Altogether, 57 studies were included of which 38 had data that were useable for meta-analysis. In the healthy aged, a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises (=0.006, SMD = 1.40, CI = 0.41, 2.40) and tai chi (=0.01, MD = 0.51, CI = 0.12, 0.91) on physical function was revealed, while strength exercise benefitted cognitive function (=0.04, SMD = 0.86, CI = 0.03, 1.68). In frail older adults, there was a significant benefit of multicomponent exercises on physical function ( < 0.0001, SMD = -10.85, CI = 5.66, 16.04) and mental health (=0.0002, SMD = -0.39, CI=-0.18, 0.59). Strength exercise had a significant benefit on activity of daily living (ADL) ( < 0.0003, SMD = 15.78, CI = 7.28, 24.28).

CONCLUSION

The substantial disparity of research in the field of exercise in older adults renders synthesis of the evidence problematic. However, it appears that multicomponent exercise is the most suitable approach for both healthy and frail older adults although the benefit may be reflected in different health outcomes.