Riper Heleen, Spek Viola, Boon Brigitte, Conijn Barbara, Kramer Jeannet, Martin-Abello Katherina, Smit Filip
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jun 30;13(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1691.
Self-help interventions without professional contact to curb adult problem drinking in the community are increasingly being delivered via the Internet.
The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall effectiveness of these eHealth interventions.
In all, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), all from high-income countries, with 9 comparison conditions and a total of 1553 participants, were identified, and their combined effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption was evaluated by means of a meta-analysis.
An overall medium effect size (g = 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-0.71, random effect model) was found for the 9 studies, all of which compared no-contact interventions to control conditions. The medium effect was maintained (g = 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.57, random effect model) after exclusion of two outliers. Type of control group, treatment location, type of analysis, and sample size did not have differential impacts on treatment outcome. A significant difference (P = .04) emerged between single-session personalized normative feedback interventions (g = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.43) and more extended e- self-help (g = 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-0.90).
E-self-help interventions without professional contact are effective in curbing adult problem drinking in high-income countries. In view of the easy scalability and low dissemination costs of such interventions, we recommend exploration of whether these could broaden the scope of effective public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries as well.
在社区中,无需专业人员介入的自助干预措施正越来越多地通过互联网来抑制成年人的问题饮酒行为。
本荟萃分析的目的是评估这些电子健康干预措施的总体效果。
共识别出9项随机对照试验(RCT),均来自高收入国家,有9种对照条件,总计1553名参与者,并通过荟萃分析评估它们在减少酒精消费方面的综合效果。
9项研究发现总体效应量中等(g = 0.44,95%可信区间0.17 - 0.71,随机效应模型),所有研究均将无接触干预与对照条件进行比较。排除两个异常值后,中等效应依然存在(g = 0.39;95%可信区间0.23 - 0.57,随机效应模型)。对照组类型、治疗地点、分析类型和样本量对治疗结果没有差异影响。单节次个性化规范反馈干预(g = 0.27,95%可信区间0.11 - 0.43)与更广泛的电子自助干预(g = 0.61,95%可信区间0.33 - 0.90)之间出现显著差异(P = 0.04)。
在高收入国家,无需专业人员介入的电子自助干预措施在抑制成年人问题饮酒方面是有效的。鉴于此类干预措施易于扩展且传播成本低,我们建议探讨它们是否也能扩大低收入和中等收入国家有效公共卫生干预措施的范围。