• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国大学医学院博士后资格规定。1998年与2010年之比较]

[Postdoctoral qualification regulations of medical faculties in German universities. A comparison of 1998 and 2010].

作者信息

Knobloch K, Sorg H, Vogt P M

机构信息

Klinik für Plastische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2012 May;83(5):452-62. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2139-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-011-2139-z
PMID:21720872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland the "Habilitation" (postgraduate qualification) is currently the highest ranked university degree which qualifies candidates to perform high ranking autonomous research and teach the specific subject at university level. Although it is legally not an academic degree, the habilitation is a mandatory qualification for the later appointment and employment as a professor. The habilitation process is a complex assessment of diverse prerequisites which differ highly in terms of uniformity among the medical faculties in Germany.

METHODS

In order to re-evaluate these prerequisites and to find out if there might be more conformity for candidates all habilitation requirements were analyzed for 12 primary outcome measures according to Nagelschmidt and rated with a specific scoring system (Nagelschmidt score).

RESULTS

The overall scoring for habilitation requirements increased from 15.2±5.1 points in 1998 to 21.9±4.0 points in 2010 (95% confidence interval 20.6-23.3, p<0.001, mainly due to increased requirements in terms of publications, teaching and mandatory board certification. No correlation was found between the number of habilitation degrees per faculty and the overall Nagelschmidt score (y=-0.0545x+26.021, r(2)=0,00028).

CONCLUSION

The requirements for habilitation have substantially increased by 44% from 1998 to 2010 in Germany. This is mainly based on higher requirements in terms of publications, teaching and board certification.

摘要

背景

在德国、奥地利和瑞士,“教授资格”(研究生资格)目前是最高等级的大学学位,使候选人有资格进行高级别的自主研究并在大学层面教授特定学科。尽管从法律上讲它不是学术学位,但教授资格是日后被任命为教授并任职的强制资格。教授资格认定过程是对各种先决条件的复杂评估,这些先决条件在德国各医学院之间的一致性差异很大。

方法

为了重新评估这些先决条件,并了解候选人之间是否可能存在更多一致性,根据纳格尔施密特的标准,对所有教授资格要求的12项主要成果指标进行了分析,并采用特定的评分系统(纳格尔施密特评分)进行评分。

结果

教授资格要求的总体评分从1998年的15.2±5.1分提高到2010年的21.9±4.0分(95%置信区间20.6 - 23.3,p<0.001),主要原因是在出版物、教学和强制委员会认证方面的要求提高。各学院教授资格学位数量与纳格尔施密特总体评分之间未发现相关性(y = -0.0545x + 26.021,r² = 0.00028)。

结论

从1998年到2010年,德国教授资格的要求大幅提高了44%。这主要是基于在出版物、教学和委员会认证方面更高的要求。

相似文献

1
[Postdoctoral qualification regulations of medical faculties in German universities. A comparison of 1998 and 2010].[德国大学医学院博士后资格规定。1998年与2010年之比较]
Chirurg. 2012 May;83(5):452-62. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2139-z.
2
[Evaluation of qualification regulations for medical faculties of German universities and recommendations for standardization].[德国大学医学院资质规定评估及标准化建议]
Chirurg. 1998 Apr;69(4):481-9. doi: 10.1007/s001040050445.
3
[Medical habilitation in German-speaking countries : Quantitative assessment of content and elaboration of habilitation guidelines].[德语国家的医学 habilitation:内容的定量评估与 habilitation 指南的制定] (注:这里“habilitation”在医学领域可能有特定含义,比如“资格认定”等,具体准确意思需结合专业背景进一步确定)
Chirurg. 2015 Apr;86(4):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2766-2.
4
[Status Quo - The requirements for medical habilitation in Germany].[德国医学康复的现状 - 要求]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 Nov;145(23):e130-e136. doi: 10.1055/a-1210-5221. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
[Medical habilitation. Accepted academic qualifications or outdated formalism?].
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Apr 15;95(4):235-42. doi: 10.1007/pl00002115.
6
[The medical habilitation at German universities: a comparison of the regulations over 23 years].[德国大学的医学 habilitations:23 年法规比较]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Aug;93(8):778-787. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01545-z. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
[Assessment of the significance and the requirements of medical postdoctoral lecture qualifications in Germany by the assessment committees].[评估委员会对德国医学博士后讲座资格的重要性及要求的评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Oct;115-116:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
Requirements for Becoming an Adjunct Professor in Medicine: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulations of German Medical Faculties.成为医学兼职教授的要求:德国医学院规定的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211856.
9
[Evidence-based medicine teaching activities in the German-speaking area: a survey].[德语区的循证医学教学活动:一项调查]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
[Medical education in the field of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy at the German universities in 2006].[2006年德国大学身心医学与心理治疗领域的医学教育]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006 Nov;56(11):438-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951811.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Academic Degrees in Germany Compared to the USA.德国与美国的牙科学术学位比较。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jun 2;10(6):98. doi: 10.3390/dj10060098.
2
[The medical habilitation at German universities: a comparison of the regulations over 23 years].[德国大学的医学 habilitations:23 年法规比较]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Aug;93(8):778-787. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01545-z. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
[Status Quo - The requirements for medical habilitation in Germany].[德国医学康复的现状 - 要求]

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific bias arising from sampling, selective recruitment, and attrition: the case for improved reporting.科学偏见源于抽样、选择性招募和人员流失:提高报告质量的必要性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):415-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1169.
2
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.将随机对照试验的方案和注册条目与已发表报告进行比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):MR000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000031.pub2.
3
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 Nov;145(23):e130-e136. doi: 10.1055/a-1210-5221. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
[The medical dissertation in Germany : A quantitative analysis of promotion regulations in medical faculties].[德国的医学博士论文:对医学院系晋升规定的定量分析]
Chirurg. 2016 Sep;87(9):775-784. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0235-9.
5
[Postdoctoral lecturer thesis in medicine: academic competence or career booster?].[医学博士后讲师论文:学术能力还是职业助推器?]
Chirurg. 2016 Jun;87(6):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0131-8.
6
[Medical habilitation in German-speaking countries : Quantitative assessment of content and elaboration of habilitation guidelines].[德语国家的医学 habilitation:内容的定量评估与 habilitation 指南的制定] (注:这里“habilitation”在医学领域可能有特定含义,比如“资格认定”等,具体准确意思需结合专业背景进一步确定)
Chirurg. 2015 Apr;86(4):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2766-2.
7
Quantitative evaluation of the requirements for the promotion as associate professor at German medical faculties.德国医学院校副教授晋升要求的量化评估
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(5):Doc69. doi: 10.3205/zma000839. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
随机对照试验中注册的主要结局与发表的主要结局的比较。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):977-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1242.
4
Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet.临床试验中的选择性报告:对《柳叶刀》接受的试验方案的分析
Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):201. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61060-0.
5
Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry, the WHO, and the Ottawa Group.临床试验注册:行业、世界卫生组织和渥太华小组的不同观点。
PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020378. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
6
[Evaluation of qualification regulations for medical faculties of German universities and recommendations for standardization].[德国大学医学院资质规定评估及标准化建议]
Chirurg. 1998 Apr;69(4):481-9. doi: 10.1007/s001040050445.