Suppr超能文献

慢性痛风患者报告结局:来自 OMERACT 10 的报告。

Patient-reported outcomes in chronic gout: a report from OMERACT 10.

机构信息

Medicine Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1452-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110271.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the endorsement of measures of patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains in chronic gout at the 2010 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Meeting (OMERACT 10).

METHODS

During the OMERACT 10 gout workshop, validation data were presented for key PRO domains including pain [pain by visual analog scale (VAS)], patient global (patient global VAS), activity limitation [Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], and a disease-specific measure, the Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ v2.0). Data were presented on all 3 aspects of the OMERACT filters of truth, discrimination, and feasibility. One PRO, health-related quality of life measurement with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 36 (SF-36), was previously endorsed at OMERACT 9.

RESULTS

One measure for each of the 3 PRO of pain, patient global, and activity limitation was endorsed by > 70% of the OMERACT delegates to have appropriate validation data. Specifically, pain measurement by VAS was endorsed by 85%, patient global assessment by VAS by 73%, and activity limitation by HAQ-DI by 71%. GAQ v2.0 received 30% vote and was not endorsed due to several concerns including low internal consistency and lack of familiarity with the measure. More validation studies are needed for this measure.

CONCLUSION

With the endorsement of one measure each for pain, patient global, SF-36, and activity limitation, all 4 PRO for chronic gout have been endorsed. Future validation studies are needed for the disease-specific measure, GAQ v2.0. Validation for PRO for acute gout will be the focus of the next validation exercise for the OMERACT gout group.

摘要

目的

总结 2010 年疗效评价方法会议(OMERACT10)中慢性痛风患者报告结局(PRO)领域指标的认可情况。

方法

在 OMERACT10 痛风研讨会上,对关键 PRO 领域的验证数据进行了介绍,包括疼痛[疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)]、患者整体[患者整体 VAS]、活动受限[健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)]和疾病特异性指标,痛风评估问卷 2.0 版(GAQv2.0)。所有 3 个 OMERACT 过滤器(真实性、区分度和可行性)方面的数据都进行了介绍。一项 PRO,即医疗结局研究简表 36 项(SF-36)健康相关生活质量测量,此前已在 OMERACT9 中获得认可。

结果

有超过 70%的 OMERACT 代表认可了每个 PRO 领域的 3 个指标中的 1 个指标,这些指标具有适当的验证数据。具体而言,VAS 测量的疼痛得到了 85%的认可,VAS 评估的患者整体状况得到了 73%的认可,HAQ-DI 评估的活动受限得到了 71%的认可。GAQv2.0 获得了 30%的投票,但由于一些问题未获得认可,包括内部一致性低和对该指标不熟悉。需要进一步开展更多的验证研究。

结论

随着对疼痛、患者整体、SF-36 和活动受限各有 1 个指标的认可,慢性痛风的所有 4 个 PRO 均已获得认可。未来需要对疾病特异性指标 GAQv2.0 进行验证。急性痛风的 PRO 验证将是 OMERACT 痛风组下一次验证工作的重点。

相似文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes in chronic gout: a report from OMERACT 10.
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1452-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110271.
2
OMERACT endorsement of measures of outcome for studies of acute gout.
J Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;41(3):569-73. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131246. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
3
Outcome measures in acute gout: a systematic literature review.
J Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;41(3):558-68. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131244. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
4
Application of the OMERACT filter to measures of core outcome domains in recent clinical studies of acute gout.
J Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;41(3):574-80. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131245. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
8
Progress in measurement instruments for acute and chronic gout studies.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2346-55. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090371.

引用本文的文献

2
Risk factors for loss to follow-up in patients with gout: A Korean prospective cohort study.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0318564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318564. eCollection 2025.
3
Non-adherence to urate lowering therapy in gout after 5 years is related to poor outcomes: results from the NOR-Gout study.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1799-1806. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae514.
5
High vegetable consumption and regular exercise are associated with better quality of life in patients with gout.
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(5):845-854. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.476. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Gout Impact Scale.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 4;38(35):e266. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e266.
8
Gout Remission as a Goal of Urate-Lowering Therapy: A Critical Review.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 23;16(6):779. doi: 10.3390/ph16060779.
9
Course and predictors of work productivity in gout - results from the NOR-Gout longitudinal 2-year treat-to-target study.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3886-3892. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead124.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally important differences of the gout impact scale in a randomized controlled trial.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1331-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker023. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
Application of the health assessment questionnaire disability index to various rheumatic diseases.
Qual Life Res. 2010 Nov;19(9):1255-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9690-9. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
3
Outcome domains for studies of acute and chronic gout.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2342-5. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090370.
4
Quality of life and quality of care for patients with gout.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2009 Apr;11(2):154-60. doi: 10.1007/s11926-009-0022-4.
5
The effect of serum urate on gout flares and their associated costs: an administrative claims analysis.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;15(1):3-7. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181945d2c.
7
Evaluation of an instrument assessing influence of Gout on health-related quality of life.
J Rheumatol. 2008 Dec;35(12):2406-14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080506. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
9
Gout and coronary artery disease: epidemiologic clues.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008 Jul;10(3):249-55. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0039-0.
10
Long-term cardiovascular mortality among middle-aged men with gout.
Arch Intern Med. 2008 May 26;168(10):1104-10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.10.1104.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验