Institut Paoli-Calmettes-Regional Center for Cancer Research and Treatment, Marseilles, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Apr;47(4):549-55. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.126. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
We report the first randomized study comparing early hospital discharge with standard hospital-based follow-up after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and PBSCT. Patients aged 18-65 years, with an indication of PBSCT for non-leukemic malignant diseases were randomly assigned between two arms. Arm A consisted of early hospital discharge (HDCT during hospitalization, discharge at day 0, home stay with a caregiver, outpatient clinic follow-up). In arm B patients were followed up as inpatients. In total 131 patients were analyzed (66 in arm A and 65 in arm B). Patient characteristics and hematological reconstitution were comparable between the two groups. In arm A, 26 patients were actually discharged early. Patients in group A spent fewer days in hospital (11 vs 12 days, P=0.006). This strategy resulted in a 6% mean cost reduction per patient when compared with the conventional hospital-based group. The early discharge approach within the French health system, while safe and feasible, is highly dependent on social criteria (caregiver availability and home to hospital distance). It is almost always associated with conventional hospital readmission during the aplasia phase, and limits cost savings when considering the whole population of patients benefiting from HDCT in routine clinical practice.
我们报告了第一项比较大剂量化疗(HDCT)和 PBSCT 后早期出院与标准住院随访的随机研究。年龄在 18-65 岁之间、因非白血病恶性疾病需要 PBSCT 的患者被随机分配到两个治疗组。A 组为早期出院(HDCT 住院期间、出院日 0、在家由护理人员照顾、门诊随访)。B 组患者作为住院患者进行随访。共分析了 131 例患者(A 组 66 例,B 组 65 例)。两组患者的特征和血液学重建情况无差异。在 A 组中,26 例患者实际上提前出院。A 组患者住院天数较少(11 天 vs 12 天,P=0.006)。与传统住院组相比,这种策略使每位患者的平均成本降低了 6%。在法国卫生系统中,这种早期出院方法安全可行,但高度依赖社会标准(护理人员的可用性和住所到医院的距离)。它几乎总是与再生障碍期的常规住院再入院相关联,并且在考虑在常规临床实践中受益于 HDCT 的所有患者人群时,限制了成本节约。