Department of Spine, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139, Zi-qiang Street, Shijiazhuang, 050051 Hebei, China.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1921-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1893-4. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
Patients with os odontoideum always present instability in atlantoaxial joint and need atlantoaxial fixation. C2 pedicle or laminar screws fixation has proven to be efficient and reliable for atlantoaxial instability. However, os odontoideum is a congenital or developmental disease, featured with anomalous bony anatomies. The anatomic measurements and guidelines for C2 pedicle screw placement in general population tends to differ with those of os odontoideum patients, for whom C2 pedicle screws are often needed. The option and techniques of C2 fixation are still challenging and yet to be fully explored.
We recruited 29 adult patients with os odontoideum and measured the dimension of C2 pedicle and lamina for each patient to examine how well do they match with the screws anatomically. In order to access the intra-observer reliability and inter-observer repeatability of the measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also calculated.
The results for reliability of the CT measurements showed excellent intraobserver (ICC = 0.95 and 0.96) and interobserver correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.93). The diameter and length of C2 pedicle were found to be 6.06 ± 1.37 and 24.05 ± 2.54 mm, while the corresponding figures of C2 laminar were 6.95 ± 0.82 and 25.60 ± 2.18 mm, respectively. In the measurements, all 29 cases had suitable diameter (larger than 5.5 mm) for C2 laminar screw (the laminar diameters ranged from 5.52 to 8.82 mm). In C2 pedicle measurements, the diameters of the 29 cases were from 3.50 to 9.86 mm, while 20 pedicles (34.5%) in 14 cases were less than 5.5 mm in diameter. Six had bilateral small pedicles where the diameter was less than 5.5 mm.
Anatomically, we found laminar screw is a better match in comparison with pedicle screw for C2 fixation in os odontoideum. The options for C2 fixation should be made based on careful preoperative imaging and thorough consideration. Preoperative reconstructive CT scan can offer great assistance for the choice of fixation in os odontoideum by revealing the anatomy of the C2 pedicles in detail.
寰枢椎椎弓根或椎板螺钉固定术已被证明可有效且可靠地治疗寰枢关节不稳定,但齿状突骨不连患者常存在寰枢关节不稳定,且其具有异常的骨性解剖结构,因此需要寰枢椎固定。齿状突骨不连是一种先天性或发育性疾病。一般人群的 C2 椎弓根螺钉置钉的解剖学测量和指南与齿状突骨不连患者的不同,而后者通常需要 C2 椎弓根螺钉。因此,C2 固定的选择和技术仍然具有挑战性,需要进一步探索。
我们招募了 29 例齿状突骨不连患者,对每位患者的 C2 椎弓根和椎板进行了尺寸测量,以检查其在解剖学上与螺钉的匹配程度。为了评估测量的观察者内可靠性和观察者间可重复性,还计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。
CT 测量的可靠性结果显示,观察者内(ICC=0.95 和 0.96)和观察者间的相关性系数(ICC=0.93)均较好。C2 椎弓根的直径和长度分别为 6.06±1.37mm 和 24.05±2.54mm,而相应的 C2 椎板尺寸分别为 6.95±0.82mm 和 25.60±2.18mm。在测量中,所有 29 例患者的 C2 椎板均有合适的直径(大于 5.5mm)(椎板直径范围为 5.528.82mm)。在 C2 椎弓根测量中,29 例患者的直径为 3.509.86mm,其中 14 例中有 20 个椎弓根(34.5%)直径小于 5.5mm,6 例双侧椎弓根直径均小于 5.5mm。
在解剖学上,与椎弓根螺钉相比,C2 椎板螺钉更适合用于齿状突骨不连的寰枢椎固定。C2 固定的选择应基于仔细的术前影像学检查和全面考虑。术前重建 CT 扫描可通过详细显示 C2 椎弓根的解剖结构,为齿状突骨不连的固定选择提供很大帮助。