• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于配体-受体复合物的支持向量回归评分进行化学库的排序和虚拟筛选。

Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2132-8. doi: 10.1021/ci200078f. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1021/ci200078f
PMID:21728360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3209528/
Abstract

The community structure-activity resource (CSAR) data sets are used to develop and test a support vector machine-based scoring function in regression mode (SVR). Two scoring functions (SVR-KB and SVR-EP) are derived with the objective of reproducing the trend of the experimental binding affinities provided within the two CSAR data sets. The features used to train SVR-KB are knowledge-based pairwise potentials, while SVR-EP is based on physicochemical properties. SVR-KB and SVR-EP were compared to seven other widely used scoring functions, including Glide, X-score, GoldScore, ChemScore, Vina, Dock, and PMF. Results showed that SVR-KB trained with features obtained from three-dimensional complexes of the PDBbind data set outperformed all other scoring functions, including best performing X-score, by nearly 0.1 using three correlation coefficients, namely Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall. It was interesting that higher performance in rank ordering did not translate into greater enrichment in virtual screening assessed using the 40 targets of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). To remedy this situation, a variant of SVR-KB (SVR-KBD) was developed by following a target-specific tailoring strategy that we had previously employed to derive SVM-SP. SVR-KBD showed a much higher enrichment, outperforming all other scoring functions tested, and was comparable in performance to our previously derived scoring function SVM-SP.

摘要

社区结构-活性资源 (CSAR) 数据集用于开发和测试基于支持向量机的回归模式评分函数 (SVR)。 有两个评分函数 (SVR-KB 和 SVR-EP) 是基于重现两个 CSAR 数据集内提供的实验结合亲和力趋势的目标而得出的。 SVR-KB 所使用的特征是基于知识的成对势能,而 SVR-EP 则基于物理化学性质。 SVR-KB 和 SVR-EP 与其他七种广泛使用的评分函数进行了比较,包括 Glide、X-score、GoldScore、ChemScore、Vina、Dock 和 PMF。 结果表明,SVR-KB 经过训练,使用从 PDBbind 数据集的三维复合物中获得的特征,在使用三个相关系数(Pearson、Spearman 和 Kendall)时,其性能优于其他所有评分函数,包括性能最佳的 X-score,接近 0.1。 有趣的是,在排序性能上的提高并没有转化为在虚拟筛选中的更高富集,而虚拟筛选是使用目录中的 40 个目标有用诱饵 (DUD) 进行评估的。 为了弥补这种情况,我们根据我们之前用于推导 SVM-SP 的目标特定定制策略,开发了 SVR-KB 的变体 (SVR-KBD)。 SVR-KBD 表现出更高的富集度,优于所有测试的其他评分函数,并且与我们之前推导的评分函数 SVM-SP 的性能相当。

相似文献

1
Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.基于配体-受体复合物的支持向量回归评分进行化学库的排序和虚拟筛选。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2132-8. doi: 10.1021/ci200078f. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.基于结构的虚拟筛选中的靶向支持向量机评分:计算验证、在激酶中的体外测试以及对肺癌细胞增殖的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Apr 25;51(4):755-9. doi: 10.1021/ci100490w. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
3
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
4
Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.结合姿势和建模结构对化学文库的SVMGen和GlideScore富集的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1139-51. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00709. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.一种混合对接和机器学习方法,可增强在蛋白质-蛋白质界面上进行的虚拟筛选的性能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 18;23(22):14364. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214364.
6
Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise. docking 和 scoring 与目标特定的 pose 分类器相结合,成功地实现了类似天然构象的 pose 识别,但在 CSAR 2014 基准测试中不能预测结合亲和力。
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1032-41. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00751. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.警惕基于机器学习的评分函数——开发黑盒的危险。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2807-15. doi: 10.1021/ci500406k. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
8
Ligand efficiency-based support vector regression models for predicting bioactivities of ligands to drug target proteins.基于配体效率的支持向量回归模型预测配体对药物靶标蛋白的生物活性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2751-63. doi: 10.1021/ci5003262. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.评估蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47. doi: 10.1021/jm030489h.
10
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.

引用本文的文献

1
Distance plus attention for binding affinity prediction.用于结合亲和力预测的距离加注意力机制
J Cheminform. 2024 May 12;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13321-024-00844-x.
2
Generalizability Improvement of Interpretable Symbolic Regression Models for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.用于定量构效关系的可解释符号回归模型的可推广性改进
ACS Omega. 2024 Feb 16;9(8):9463-9474. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09047. eCollection 2024 Feb 27.
3
Improving structure-based protein-ligand affinity prediction by graph representation learning and ensemble learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.基于结构的虚拟筛选中的靶向支持向量机评分:计算验证、在激酶中的体外测试以及对肺癌细胞增殖的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Apr 25;51(4):755-9. doi: 10.1021/ci100490w. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
2
Docking Small Molecules to Predicted Off-Targets of the Cancer Drug Erlotinib Leads to Inhibitors of Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation with Suitable In vitro Pharmacokinetic Properties.将小分子对接至抗癌药物厄洛替尼的预测脱靶位点可产生具有合适体外药代动力学特性的肺癌细胞增殖抑制剂。
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2010 Aug 12;1(5):229-233. doi: 10.1021/ml100031a.
3
通过图表示学习和集成学习提高基于结构的蛋白配体亲和力预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0296676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296676. eCollection 2024.
4
Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.基于结构的深度学习预测蛋白质-配体结合亲和力的评分函数综述
Front Bioinform. 2022 Jun 17;2. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.885983.
5
QSPR model for Caco-2 cell permeability prediction using a combination of HQPSO and dual-RBF neural network.基于混合量子粒子群优化算法和双径向基函数神经网络的用于预测Caco-2细胞通透性的定量构效关系模型
RSC Adv. 2020 Nov 26;10(70):42938-42952. doi: 10.1039/d0ra08209k. eCollection 2020 Nov 23.
6
Dowker complex based machine learning (DCML) models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.基于 Dowker 复合物的机器学习 (DCML) 模型用于预测蛋白质-配体结合亲和力。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Apr 6;18(4):e1009943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009943. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Ensemble learning from ensemble docking: revisiting the optimum ensemble size problem.从集合对接中进行集成学习:重新探讨最优集成规模问题。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04448-5.
8
Using diverse potentials and scoring functions for the development of improved machine-learned models for protein-ligand affinity and docking pose prediction.利用多样化的势能和评分函数,开发改进的基于机器学习的蛋白质-配体亲和力和对接构象预测模型。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2021 Nov;35(11):1095-1123. doi: 10.1007/s10822-021-00423-4. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.药物发现中的机器学习:综述
Artif Intell Rev. 2022;55(3):1947-1999. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
10
Recent trends in artificial intelligence-driven identification and development of anti-neurodegenerative therapeutic agents.人工智能驱动的抗神经退行性治疗药物识别与开发的最新趋势。
Mol Divers. 2021 Aug;25(3):1517-1539. doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10274-8. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
一种基于机器学习的蛋白质 - 配体结合亲和力预测方法及其在分子对接中的应用。
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 1;26(9):1169-75. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
4
Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.基于性质编码形状分布特征的结合亲和力预测。
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Feb 22;50(2):298-308. doi: 10.1021/ci9004139.
5
AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.AutoDock Vina:通过新的评分函数、高效优化和多线程改进对接的速度和准确性。
J Comput Chem. 2010 Jan 30;31(2):455-61. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334.
6
PDBcal: a comprehensive dataset for receptor-ligand interactions with three-dimensional structures and binding thermodynamics from isothermal titration calorimetry.PDBcal:一个用于受体-配体相互作用的综合数据集,包含三维结构以及等温滴定量热法测定的结合热力学数据。
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2008 Jun;71(6):529-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00661.x. Epub 2008 May 9.
7
Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods.计算方法评估建议。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(3-4):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s10822-008-9196-5. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
8
A computational investigation of allostery in the catabolite activator protein.分解代谢物激活蛋白变构作用的计算研究。
J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Dec 19;129(50):15668-76. doi: 10.1021/ja076046a. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
9
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.分子对接的基准测试集。
J Med Chem. 2006 Nov 16;49(23):6789-801. doi: 10.1021/jm0608356.
10
Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking.蛋白质-配体对接的打分函数。
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2006 Oct;7(5):407-20. doi: 10.2174/138920306778559395.