• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有有限关联能力的无标度网络中的合作。

Cooperation in scale-free networks with limited associative capacities.

作者信息

Poncela Julia, Gómez-Gardeñes Jesús, Moreno Yamir

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.

出版信息

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 May;83(5 Pt 2):057101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.057101. Epub 2011 May 4.

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.057101
PMID:21728697
Abstract

In this work we study the effect of limiting the number of interactions (the associative capacity) that a node can establish per round of a prisoner's dilemma game. We focus on the way this limitation influences the level of cooperation sustained by scale-free networks. We show that when the game includes cooperation costs, limiting the associative capacity of nodes to a fixed quantity renders in some cases larger values of cooperation than in the unrestricted scenario. This allows one to define an optimum capacity for which cooperation is maximally enhanced. Finally, for the case without cooperation costs, we find that even a tight limitation of the associative capacity of nodes yields the same levels of cooperation as in the original network.

摘要

在这项工作中,我们研究了限制节点在每一轮囚徒困境博弈中能够建立的交互数量(关联能力)所产生的影响。我们关注这种限制影响无标度网络维持的合作水平的方式。我们表明,当博弈包含合作成本时,在某些情况下,将节点的关联能力限制为固定数量会产生比无限制场景下更大的合作值。这使得人们能够定义一个使合作得到最大增强的最优能力。最后,对于没有合作成本的情况,我们发现即使对节点的关联能力进行严格限制,产生的合作水平也与原始网络中的相同。

相似文献

1
Cooperation in scale-free networks with limited associative capacities.具有有限关联能力的无标度网络中的合作。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 May;83(5 Pt 2):057101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.057101. Epub 2011 May 4.
2
A condition for cooperation in a game on complex networks.复杂网络博弈中的合作条件。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.033. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
3
Impact of interaction style and degree on the evolution of cooperation on Barabási-Albert scale-free network.交互风格和程度对巴拉巴西-阿尔伯特无标度网络上合作演化的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182523. eCollection 2017.
4
Stability of strategies in payoff-driven evolutionary games on networks.网络收益驱动进化博弈中的策略稳定性。
Chaos. 2011 Sep;21(3):033110. doi: 10.1063/1.3613924.
5
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.演化随机网络上的进化囚徒困境
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042142. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042142. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Evolution of cooperation mediated by limiting resources: connecting resource based models and evolutionary game theory.限制资源介导的合作进化:基于资源的模型与进化博弈论的连接。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Mar 7;272(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.005. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
7
Network-based criterion for the success of cooperation in an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma.基于网络的进化囚徒困境中合作成功的标准
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Aug;86(2 Pt 2):026113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.026113. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
8
Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.稀疏聚类在协调和竞争中胜过无标度网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 22;6:21870. doi: 10.1038/srep21870.
9
Difference of reciprocity effect in two coevolutionary models of presumed two-player and multiplayer games.假定的两人及多人博弈的两种协同进化模型中互惠效应的差异。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jun;87(6):062136. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.062136. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
10
Impact of aging on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.衰老对空间囚徒困境博弈中合作演化的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Aug;80(2 Pt 1):021901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021901. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of influential invaders in evolutionary populations.鉴定进化群体中的具影响力的入侵物种。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43853-9.
2
Intermediate Levels of Network Heterogeneity Provide the Best Evolutionary Outcomes.网络异质性的中级水平提供了最佳的进化结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15555-7.
3
Impact of interaction style and degree on the evolution of cooperation on Barabási-Albert scale-free network.交互风格和程度对巴拉巴西-阿尔伯特无标度网络上合作演化的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182523. eCollection 2017.
4
Multiple effect of social influence on cooperation in interdependent network games.社会影响对相互依存网络博弈中合作的多重效应。
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 1;5:14657. doi: 10.1038/srep14657.
5
Costs for switching partners reduce network dynamics but not cooperative behaviour.更换合作伙伴的成本会降低网络动态性,但不会影响合作行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 7;281(1792). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1661.
6
Spreading of cooperative behaviour across interdependent groups.合作行为在相互依存群体中的传播。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2483. doi: 10.1038/srep02483.
7
Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation.网络之间的最优相互依存关系促进合作的演化。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2470. doi: 10.1038/srep02470.
8
Different reactions to adverse neighborhoods in games of cooperation.合作游戏中对不利环境的不同反应。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035183. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
9
Win-stay-lose-learn promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.胜留败走促进空间囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030689. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
10
An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games.一种在博弈生态系统中进行分类的制度机制。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023019. Epub 2011 Aug 5.