Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement, Technical University of Lisbon, Estrada da Costa, 1495-688 Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2012 Jan;30(1):100-8. doi: 10.1007/s00774-011-0294-4. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
In the context of physical education curricula, markers of physical fitness (e.g., aerobic capacity, muscular strength, flexibility, and body mass index or body fat) are usually evaluated in reference to health standards. Despite their possible mediating role in the relationship between weight-bearing or muscle forces and features of bone tissue, these attributes of fitness may not be the most relevant to predict skeletal health. It is therefore important to analyze the relative contribution of these factors to the variability in bone tissue of different parts of the skeleton, and to analyze it by gender, as sensitivity to mechanical loading can diverge for boys and girls. We compared the effects of habitual physical activity (PA) and lean mass, as surrogates of weight-bearing and muscle forces, and of physical fitness (aerobic and muscle capacity of lower and upper limbs) on bone mineral content (BMC) and size of total body, lumbar spine, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius in 53 girls and 64 boys from 7.9 to 9.7 years of age. After controlling for bone age, body mass, body height, and calcium intake, lean mass was the most important predictor of bone size and/or mineral in both genders (p < 0.05), while habitual weight-bearing PA positively influenced BMC in boys (p < 0.05). The effect of muscle in bone was not determined by PA and fitness score did not explain bone variability. Femoral neck was the bone site more closely associated with mechanical loading factors; boys with a PA > 608 counts/min/day (~105 min/day of moderate and vigorous intensity) showed 13-20% more BMC than those with less physical activity, and girls with a lean mass >19 kg showed 12-19% more BMC than those with less lean mass. These findings suggest that lean mass was the most important predictor of bone size and/or mineralization in both genders, while habitual weight-bearing PA appears to positively impact on bone mineral in prepubertal boys and that both lean mass and PA need to be considered in physical education curricula and other health-enhancing programs.
在体育课程中,身体素质指标(如有氧能力、肌肉力量、柔韧性和身体质量指数或体脂肪)通常参照健康标准进行评估。尽管它们在承重或肌肉力量与骨组织特征之间的关系中可能具有中介作用,但这些健康指标可能与预测骨骼健康最不相关。因此,重要的是要分析这些因素对不同骨骼部位骨组织变异性的相对贡献,并按性别进行分析,因为机械负荷的敏感性在男孩和女孩之间可能会有所不同。我们比较了习惯性体力活动(PA)和瘦体重作为承重和肌肉力量的替代指标,以及身体素质(上下肢有氧和肌肉能力)对全身、腰椎、股骨颈和 1/3 半径的骨矿物质含量(BMC)和大小的影响在 7.9 至 9.7 岁的 53 名女孩和 64 名男孩中。在控制骨龄、体重、身高和钙摄入量后,瘦体重是两性中骨骼大小和/或矿物质的最重要预测指标(p<0.05),而习惯性承重 PA 对男孩的 BMC 有积极影响(p<0.05)。肌肉对骨骼的影响不是由 PA 决定的,而身体素质得分也不能解释骨骼的变异性。股骨颈是与机械负荷因素最密切相关的骨骼部位;PA>608 计数/分钟/天(~105 分钟/天的中高强度)的男孩比体力活动较少的男孩 BMC 多 13-20%,而瘦体重>19kg 的女孩比瘦体重较少的女孩 BMC 多 12-19%。这些发现表明,瘦体重是两性中骨骼大小和/或矿化的最重要预测指标,而习惯性承重 PA 似乎对青春期前男孩的骨矿物质有积极影响,并且在体育课程和其他促进健康的计划中需要考虑瘦体重和 PA。