Suppr超能文献

经自然腔道内镜手术:低压气腹已足够,且与改善心肺反应相关(PressurePig 研究)。

Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient and is associated with an improved cardiopulmonary response (PressurePig Study).

机构信息

II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):808-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256559. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this randomized trial in the acute porcine model was to compare the quality of transgastric peritoneoscopy with the use of low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum and to evaluate the respective associated cardiopulmonary changes.

METHODS

For transgastric peritoneoscopy, carbon dioxide was insufflated via the endoscope for a constant intraperitoneal pressure of 6 mmHg or 12 mmHg in 9 pigs each. The quality of transgastric peritoneoscopy was rated on a visual analog scale (0 mm, min.; 100 mm, max.) by the endoscopist, who was blinded to the intraperitoneal pressure. The cardiac index and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, reflecting preload) were measured every 3 minutes by transpulmonary thermodilution. The following were also recorded: heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI, reflecting afterload), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), pH, PCO (2), and PO (2).

RESULTS

The quality of transgastric peritoneoscopy with the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum was not inferior to that obtained using standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (87.0 mm vs. 87.3 mm; P<0.05). In both groups we observed a statistically significant rise in MAP and SVRI. The increase in SVRI was less pronounced during low-pressure peritoneum ( P=0.042), indicating a reduced stress response in comparison to standard-pressure peritoneum. There were no relevant differences between the groups in relation to cardiac index, GEDVI, and heart rate. An intra-abdominal pressure of 6 mmHg also led to better oxygenation ( P=0.031 for difference in PO (2) between the two groups) due to lower peak inspiratory pressure ( P<0.001 for difference). There were only slight differences between the groups with regard to pH and PCO (2).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumoperitoneum of 12-16 mmHg is used for standard laparoscopy. For NOTES, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient and is associated with an improved cardiopulmonary response compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

摘要

背景与目的

本项随机试验的目的是比较在急性猪模型中使用低压与标准气压气腹行经胃腹腔镜检查的质量,并评估各自相关的心肺变化。

方法

为了经胃腹腔镜检查,二氧化碳通过内镜以 6mmHg 或 12mmHg 的恒定腹腔内压力注入,每组各 9 头猪。内镜医生使用视觉模拟评分(0mm,最低;100mm,最高)对经胃腹腔镜检查的质量进行评分,内镜医生对腹腔内压力不知情。每 3 分钟通过经肺热稀释法测量心指数和全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI,反映前负荷)。还记录心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、全身血管阻力指数(SVRI,反映后负荷)、吸气峰压(PIP)、pH 值、PCO 2 和 PO 2 。

结果

使用低压气腹行经胃腹腔镜检查的质量不逊于使用标准气压气腹(87.0mm 比 87.3mm;P<0.05)。在两组中,我们均观察到 MAP 和 SVRI 显著升高。低压气腹时 SVRI 的升高幅度较小(P=0.042),表明与标准气压气腹相比,应激反应较小。两组间心指数、GEDVI 和心率无显著差异。6mmHg 的腹腔内压力也可导致更好的氧合(两组间 PO 2 的差异 P=0.031),因为吸气峰压较低(两组间差异 P<0.001)。两组间 pH 值和 PCO 2 仅有轻微差异。

结论

12-16mmHg 的气腹用于标准腹腔镜检查。对于NOTES,低压气腹是足够的,与标准气压气腹相比,它与改善的心肺反应相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验