Suppr超能文献

应用第十届移植病理学年会工作组建议评估移植肾多瘤病毒肾病的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver agreement for Polyomavirus nephropathy grading in renal allografts using the working proposal from the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, T2V 1P9 Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Pathol. 2011 Dec;42(12):2018-24. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

Abstract

A classification schema for grading Polyomavirus nephropathy was proposed at the 2009 Banff allograft meeting. The schema included 3 stages of Polyomavirus nephropathy: early (stage A), florid (stage B), and late sclerosing (stage C). Grading categories for histologic viral load levels were also proposed. To examine the applicability and the interobserver agreement of the proposed Polyomavirus nephropathy grading schema, we evaluated 24 renal allograft biopsies with confirmed Polyomavirus nephropathy by histology and SV40. Four renal pathologists independently scored the Polyomavirus nephropathy stage (A, B, or C), without knowledge of the clinical history. Viral load was scored as a percent of tubules exhibiting viral replication, using either a 3-tier viral load score (1: ≤1%; 2: >1%-10%; 3: >10%) or a 4-tier score (1: ≤1%; 2: >1%-≤5%; 3: >5%-15%; 4: >15%). The κ score for the Polyomavirus nephropathy stage was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.60; P < .001). There was a substantial agreement using both the 3-tier and the 4-tier scoring for the viral load (Kendall concordance coefficients, 0.72 and 0.76, respectively; P < .001 for both). A better complete agreement was found using the 3-tier viral load score. In this first attempt to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of the proposed Polyomavirus nephropathy classifying schema, we demonstrated moderate κ agreement in assessing the Polyomavirus nephropathy stage and a substantial agreement in scoring the viral load level. The proposed grading schema can be applied in routine allograft biopsy practice for grading the Polyomavirus nephropathy stage and the viral load level.

摘要

2009 年班夫同种异体移植会议提出了一种用于肾细包多瘤病毒病分级的分类方案。该方案包括肾细包多瘤病毒病的 3 个阶段:早期(A 期)、活跃期(B 期)和晚期硬化期(C 期)。还提出了组织学病毒载量水平的分级类别。为了检验所提出的肾细包多瘤病毒病分级方案的适用性和观察者间一致性,我们通过组织学和 SV40 检查评估了 24 例经组织学和 SV40 检查证实的肾移植活检标本。4 名肾病理学家在不了解临床病史的情况下,分别对肾细包多瘤病毒病分期(A、B 或 C)进行评分。病毒载量通过使用 3 级病毒载量评分(1:≤1%;2:>1%-10%;3:>10%)或 4 级评分(1:≤1%;2:>1%-≤5%;3:>5%-15%;4:>15%)来评分,分别表示显示病毒复制的肾小管比例。肾细包多瘤病毒病分期的κ评分为 0.47(95%置信区间,0.35-0.60;P<.001)。使用 3 级和 4 级评分,病毒载量的一致性均较高(Kendall 一致性系数分别为 0.72 和 0.76;两者均<.001)。使用 3 级病毒载量评分可获得更好的完全一致性。在首次尝试评估所提出的肾细包多瘤病毒病分类方案的观察者间可重复性中,我们发现评估肾细包多瘤病毒病分期的κ一致性适中,评分病毒载量水平的一致性较高。该分级方案可用于常规移植活检,以分级肾细包多瘤病毒病分期和病毒载量水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验