California Pacific Medical Center, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Oct;66(10):1108-13. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr101. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
Objective methods to measure daily energy expenditure in studies of aging are needed. We sought to determine the accuracy of total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) estimates from the SenseWear Pro armband (SWA) using software versions 6.1 (SWA 6.1) and 5.1 (SWA 5.1) relative to criterion methods in free-living older adults.
Participants (n = 19, mean age 82.0 years) wore a SWA for a mean ± SD 12.5 ± 1.1 days, including while sleeping. During this same period, criterion values for TEE were assessed with doubly labeled water and for resting metabolic rate (RMR) with indirect calorimetry. AEE was calculated as 0.9 TEE - RMR.
For TEE, there was no difference in mean ± SD values from doubly labeled water (2,040 ± 472 kcal/day) versus SWA 6.1 (2,012 ± 497 kcal/day, p = .593) or SWA 5.1 (2,066 ± 474 kcal/day, p = .606); individual values were highly correlated between methods (SWA 6.1 r = .893, p < .001; SWA 5.1 r = .901, p < .001) and demonstrated strong agreement (SWA 6.1 intraclass correlation coefficient = .896; SWA 5.1 intraclass correlation coefficient = .904). For AEE, mean values from SWA 6.1 (427 ± 304 kcal/day) were lower by 26.8% than criterion values (583 ± 242 kcal/day, p = .003), and mean values from SWA 5.1 (475 ± 299 kcal/day) were lower by 18.5% than criterion values (p = .021); however, individual values were highly correlated between methods (SWA 6.1 r = .760, p < .001; SWA 5.1 r = .786, p < .001) and demonstrated moderate agreement (SWA 6.1 intraclass correlation coefficient = .645; SWA 5.1 intraclass correlation coefficient = .720). Bland-Altman plots identified no systematic bias for TEE or AEE.
Acceptable levels of agreement were observed between SWA and criterion measurements of TEE and AEE in older adults.
需要客观的方法来测量衰老研究中的日常能量消耗。我们试图确定 SenseWear Pro 臂带(SWA)的总能量消耗(TEE)和活动能量消耗(AEE)估计值的准确性,使用软件版本 6.1(SWA 6.1)和 5.1(SWA 5.1)与自由生活的老年人的标准方法相对。
参与者(n = 19,平均年龄 82.0 岁)平均佩戴 SWA 12.5 ± 1.1 天,包括睡眠期间。在此期间,使用双标记水评估 TEE 的标准值,使用间接热量法评估静息代谢率(RMR)。AEE 计算为 0.9 TEE - RMR。
对于 TEE,双标记水(2040 ± 472 kcal/天)与 SWA 6.1(2012 ± 497 kcal/天,p =.593)或 SWA 5.1(2066 ± 474 kcal/天,p =.606)之间的平均值没有差异; 两种方法之间的个体值高度相关(SWA 6.1 r =.893,p <.001;SWA 5.1 r =.901,p <.001),并且具有很强的一致性(SWA 6.1 组内相关系数 =.896;SWA 5.1 组内相关系数 =.904)。对于 AEE,SWA 6.1(427 ± 304 kcal/天)的平均值比标准值(583 ± 242 kcal/天,p =.003)低 26.8%,而 SWA 5.1(475 ± 299 kcal/天)的平均值低 18.5%比标准值(p =.021); 然而,两种方法之间的个体值高度相关(SWA 6.1 r =.760,p <.001;SWA 5.1 r =.786,p <.001),并且具有中等一致性(SWA 6.1 组内相关系数 =.645;SWA 5.1 组内相关系数 =.720)。Bland-Altman 图未识别 TEE 或 AEE 的系统偏差。
在老年人中,SWA 与标准 TEE 和 AEE 测量之间观察到可接受的一致性水平。