Gori Monica, Mazzilli Giacomo, Sandini Giulio, Burr David
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Genova, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:55. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00055. eCollection 2011.
Many recent studies show that the human brain integrates information across the different senses and that stimuli of one sensory modality can enhance the perception of other modalities. Here we study the processes that mediate cross-modal facilitation and summation between visual and tactile motion. We find that while summation produced a generic, non-specific improvement of thresholds, probably reflecting higher-order interaction of decision signals, facilitation reveals a strong, direction-specific interaction, which we believe reflects sensory interactions. We measured visual and tactile velocity discrimination thresholds over a wide range of base velocities and conditions. Thresholds for both visual and tactile stimuli showed the characteristic "dipper function," with the minimum thresholds occurring at a given "pedestal speed." When visual and tactile coherent stimuli were combined (summation condition) the thresholds for these multisensory stimuli also showed a "dipper function" with the minimum thresholds occurring in a similar range to that for unisensory signals. However, the improvement of multisensory thresholds was weak and not directionally specific, well predicted by the maximum-likelihood estimation model (agreeing with previous research). A different technique (facilitation) did, however, reveal direction-specific enhancement. Adding a non-informative "pedestal" motion stimulus in one sensory modality (vision or touch) selectively lowered thresholds in the other, by the same amount as pedestals in the same modality. Facilitation did not occur for neutral stimuli like sounds (that would also have reduced temporal uncertainty), nor for motion in opposite direction, even in blocked trials where the subjects knew that the motion was in the opposite direction showing that the facilitation was not under subject control. Cross-sensory facilitation is strong evidence for functionally relevant cross-sensory integration at early levels of sensory processing.
最近的许多研究表明,人类大脑会整合来自不同感官的信息,且一种感官模态的刺激能够增强对其他模态的感知。在此,我们研究介导视觉与触觉运动之间跨模态促进和总和的过程。我们发现,虽然总和产生了阈值的一般性、非特异性改善,这可能反映了决策信号的高阶相互作用,但促进作用揭示了一种强烈的、方向特异性的相互作用,我们认为这反映了感官相互作用。我们在广泛的基础速度和条件下测量了视觉和触觉速度辨别阈值。视觉和触觉刺激的阈值均呈现出特征性的“勺状函数”,最低阈值出现在给定的“基座速度”下。当视觉和触觉相干刺激相结合时(总和条件),这些多感官刺激的阈值也呈现出“勺状函数”,最低阈值出现在与单感官信号相似的范围内。然而,多感官阈值的改善较弱且无方向特异性,最大似然估计模型能很好地预测这一点(与先前研究一致)。不过,一种不同的技术(促进作用)确实揭示了方向特异性增强。在一种感官模态(视觉或触觉)中添加一个无信息的“基座”运动刺激会选择性地降低另一种模态中的阈值,降低幅度与同一模态中的基座相同。对于声音等中性刺激(这也会减少时间不确定性)以及相反方向的运动,促进作用并未发生,即使在被试知道运动方向相反的阻断试验中也是如此,这表明促进作用不受被试控制。跨感官促进作用是早期感官处理水平上功能相关的跨感官整合的有力证据。