Broad data sharing in genetic research: views of institutional review board professionals.
作者信息
Lemke Amy A, Smith Maureen E, Wolf Wendy A, Trinidad Susan Brown
机构信息
Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
出版信息
IRB. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):1-5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Offering results to research subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board policy.向研究对象提供研究结果：美国机构审查委员会政策
Account Res. 2007 Oct-Dec;14(4):255-67. doi: 10.1080/08989620701670179.
3
Oversight of Genomic Data Sharing: What Roles for Ethics and Data Access Committees?基因组数据共享的监督：伦理和数据访问委员会应发挥什么作用？
Biopreserv Biobank. 2017 Oct;15(5):469-474. doi: 10.1089/bio.2017.0045. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
Genomics: data sharing needs an international code of conduct.基因组学：数据共享需要一部国际行为准则。
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):31-33. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00082-9.
5
Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries.发展中国家全基因组关联研究中的伦理数据发布。
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000143. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
6
Genomic Data-Sharing Practices.基因组数据共享实践。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):31-40. doi: 10.1177/1073110519840482.
7
Currents in contemporary bioethics. Open access as benefit sharing? The example of publicly funded large-scale genomic databases.当代生物伦理学的潮流。开放获取作为利益共享？以公共资助的大规模基因组数据库为例。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Spring;40(1):143-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00652.x.
8
Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients' family members.关于共享包括患者家庭成员在内的基因组数据的伦理问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 18;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0310-5.
9
Questioning the limits of genomic privacy.质疑基因组隐私的界限。
Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Sep 7;91(3):577-8; author reply 579. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.027.
10
Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.伦理终局：为狭隘利益提供广泛同意；为封闭思维提供公开同意。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Oct;20(4):572-83. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000314.
引用本文的文献
1
Identifying the most important facilitators of open research data sharing and reuse in Epidemiology: A mixed-methods study.识别流行病学中促进开放研究数据共享和再利用的最重要因素：一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297969. eCollection 2024.
2
A policy Delphi study to validate the key implications of data sharing (KIDS) framework for pediatric genomics in Canada.采用政策德尔菲研究验证数据共享（KIDS）框架在加拿大儿科基因组学中的关键影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 9;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00635-1.
3
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.百慕大三角：人类基因组计划历史中数据共享的语用学、政策与原则
J Hist Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):693-805. doi: 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7.
4
Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.癌症登记参与者、基因组研究人员和机构审查委员会之间关于向参与者反馈基因组结果的争议。
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(1-2):18-26. doi: 10.1159/000490235. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.超越同意：在精准医学研究中与不同人群建立信任关系。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.
6
A comparison of views regarding the use of de-identified data.关于使用去识别数据的观点比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):113-118. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx054.
7
To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.分享还是不分享？对美国西南部一个种族多样化地区的生物医学研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239. eCollection 2015.
8
From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees.从基因组数据共享的原则到数据访问委员会的实践。
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 May;7(5):507-9. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201405002.
9
The translational potential of research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics.关于基因组学伦理、法律和社会影响的研究的转化潜力。
Genet Med. 2015 Jan;17(1):12-20. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.74. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.机构审查委员会主席对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
IRB. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):1-10.
本文引用的文献
1
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.对基因研究综述的态度：人类基因研究人员调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(6):337-45. doi: 10.1159/000324931. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
2
Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.简化生物库知情同意书：利益相关者的观点。
Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):567-72. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ead64d.
3
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection.对基因研究审查的态度：一项针对参与人类受试者保护的专业人员的全国性调查结果。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):83-91. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.83.
4
The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.美国国立医学图书馆的基因型和表型数据库（NCBI dbGaP）。
Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1181-6. doi: 10.1038/ng1007-1181.
5
Ethics. Identifiability in genomic research.伦理学。基因组研究中的可识别性。
Science. 2007 Aug 3;317(5838):600-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1147699.
6
Part III: meeting the challenge when data sharing is required.第三部分：在需要数据共享时应对挑战。
IRB. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):10-5.
7
An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future.基因组数据隐私保护技术的现状评估与未来路线图。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):28-34. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1603. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
8
Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.一项多中心遗传流行病学研究在当地机构审查中存在的问题性差异。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 16;290(3):360-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.3.360.
Zotero 插件