Suppr超能文献

分享还是不分享?对美国西南部一个种族多样化地区的生物医学研究人员的调查。

To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.

作者信息

Oushy Mai H, Palacios Rebecca, Holden Alan E C, Ramirez Amelie G, Gallion Kipling J, O'Connell Mary A

机构信息

Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America.

Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer health disparities research depends on access to biospecimens from diverse racial/ethnic populations. This multimethodological study, using mixed methods for quantitative and qualitative analysis of survey results, assessed barriers, concerns, and practices for sharing biospecimens/data among researchers working with biospecimens from minority populations in a 5 state region of the United States (Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas). The ultimate goals of this research were to understand data sharing barriers among biomedical researchers; guide strategies to increase participation in biospecimen research; and strengthen collaborative opportunities among researchers.

METHODS AND POPULATION

Email invitations to anonymous participants (n = 605 individuals identified by the NIH RePORT database), resulted in 112 responses. The survey assessed demographics, specimen collection data, and attitudes about virtual biorepositories. Respondents were primarily principal investigators at PhD granting institutions (91.1%) conducting basic (62.3%) research; most were non-Hispanic White (63.4%) and men (60.6%). The low response rate limited the statistical power of the analyses, further the number of respondents for each survey question was variable.

RESULTS

Findings from this study identified barriers to biospecimen research, including lack of access to sufficient biospecimens, and limited availability of diverse tissue samples. Many of these barriers can be attributed to poor annotation of biospecimens, and researchers' unwillingness to share existing collections. Addressing these barriers to accessing biospecimens is essential to combating cancer in general and cancer health disparities in particular. This study confirmed researchers' willingness to participate in a virtual biorepository (n = 50 respondents agreed). However, researchers in this region listed clear specifications for establishing and using such a biorepository: specifications related to standardized procedures, funding, and protections of human subjects and intellectual property. The results help guide strategies to increase data sharing behaviors and to increase participation of researchers with multiethnic biospecimen collections in collaborative research endeavors.

CONCLUSIONS

Data sharing by researchers is essential to leveraging knowledge and resources needed for the advancement of research on cancer health disparities. Although U.S. funding entities have guidelines for data and resource sharing, future efforts should address researcher preferences in order to promote collaboration to address cancer health disparities.

摘要

背景

癌症健康差异研究依赖于获取不同种族/族裔人群的生物样本。这项多方法研究采用混合方法对调查结果进行定量和定性分析,评估了美国五个州(亚利桑那州、科罗拉多州、新墨西哥州、俄克拉何马州和得克萨斯州)从事少数族裔人群生物样本研究的人员在共享生物样本/数据方面的障碍、担忧和做法。这项研究的最终目标是了解生物医学研究人员之间的数据共享障碍;指导增加生物样本研究参与度的策略;并加强研究人员之间的合作机会。

方法与人群

向匿名参与者发送电子邮件邀请(美国国立卫生研究院研究项目在线报告工具数据库识别出的605人),共收到112份回复。该调查评估了人口统计学特征、样本采集数据以及对虚拟生物样本库的态度。受访者主要是博士授予机构的首席研究员(91.1%),从事基础研究(62.3%);大多数是非西班牙裔白人(63.4%)和男性(60.6%)。低回复率限制了分析的统计效力,此外每个调查问题的受访者数量也各不相同。

结果

本研究的结果确定了生物样本研究的障碍,包括无法获得足够的生物样本,以及多样的组织样本供应有限。其中许多障碍可归因于生物样本注释不佳以及研究人员不愿分享现有样本库。解决这些获取生物样本的障碍对于总体抗击癌症,尤其是消除癌症健康差异至关重要。本研究证实研究人员愿意参与虚拟生物样本库(50名受访者表示同意)。然而,该地区的研究人员列出了建立和使用此类生物样本库的明确规范:与标准化程序、资金以及人类受试者和知识产权保护相关的规范。这些结果有助于指导增加数据共享行为的策略,并提高拥有多种族生物样本库的研究人员参与合作研究的程度。

结论

研究人员的数据共享对于利用推进癌症健康差异研究所需的知识和资源至关重要。尽管美国资助实体有数据和资源共享指南,但未来的努力应考虑研究人员的偏好,以促进合作来解决癌症健康差异问题。

相似文献

1
To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239. eCollection 2015.
2
Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610199.
3
Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719. eCollection 2021.
4
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
5
Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199550. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9550.
6
Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.
7
How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun;19(3):156-162. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0072. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens.
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1.
10
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens.
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1.
4
What drives academic data sharing?
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118053. eCollection 2015.
5
Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 16;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv012. Print 2015 Apr.
6
Getting a Fair Share: Attitudes and Perceptions of Biobank Stakeholders Concerning the Fairness of Sample Sharing.
Bioethics. 2015 Jul;29(6):424-30. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12134. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Diabetes and racial/ethnic differences in hepatocellular carcinoma risk: the multiethnic cohort.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 18;106(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju326. Print 2014 Dec.
8
Increased expression of tumor proliferation genes in Hispanic women with early-stage breast cancer.
Cancer Invest. 2014 Nov;32(9):439-44. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2014.958232. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
9
RTCGAToolbox: a new tool for exporting TCGA Firehose data.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e106397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106397. eCollection 2014.
10
Increase in testicular germ cell tumor incidence among Hispanic adolescents and young adults in the United States.
Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2728-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28684. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验