Department of Physiotherapy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Clin Radiol. 2011 Nov;66(11):1036-48. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to detect partial and complete thickness rotator cuff tears based on all available clinical trials.
An electronic search of databases registering published and unpublished literature was conducted. All diagnostic accuracy studies that directly compared the accuracy of ultrasound (the index test) to either arthroscopic or open surgical findings (the reference test) for rotator cuff tear were included. The methodological quality of each included study was assessed using the QUADAS form. When appropriate, pooled sensitivity and specificity analysis was conducted, with an assessment of the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each analysis.
Sixty-two studies assessing 6007 patients and 6066 shoulders were included. Ultrasonography had good sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of partial thickness (sensitivity 0.84; specificity 0.89), and full-thickness rotator cuff tears (sensitivity 0.96; specificity 0.93). However, the literature poorly described population characteristics, assessor blinding, and was based on limited sample sizes. The literature assessing transducer frequency was particularly small in size.
Ultrasonography is an appropriate radiological technique for the assessment of rotator cuff tears with an acceptable sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound is superior for the detection of full-thickness compared to partial-thickness cuff tears. Further study assessing the effect of transducer frequency is warranted.
基于所有可用的临床试验,确定超声检测肩袖部分和全层撕裂的诊断准确性。
对已发表和未发表文献的数据库进行了电子检索。所有直接比较超声(索引试验)与关节镜或开放性手术结果(参考试验)对肩袖撕裂准确性的诊断准确性研究均被纳入。使用 QUADAS 表格评估每个纳入研究的方法学质量。在适当的情况下,进行了汇总敏感性和特异性分析,并对每个分析的汇总受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行了评估。
纳入了 62 项研究,共评估了 6007 名患者和 6066 个肩部。超声检查对评估肩袖部分厚度(敏感性 0.84;特异性 0.89)和全层撕裂(敏感性 0.96;特异性 0.93)具有良好的敏感性和特异性。然而,文献对人群特征、评估者盲法的描述较差,且样本量有限。评估换能器频率的文献尤其规模较小。
超声检查是一种评估肩袖撕裂的合适影像学技术,具有可接受的敏感性和特异性。与检测部分厚度肩袖撕裂相比,超声检查对全厚度肩袖撕裂的诊断准确性更高。需要进一步研究评估换能器频率的影响。