Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2011 Nov;21(11):1576-87. doi: 10.1177/1049732311415288. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Heideggerian researchers recognize that people and their worlds are coconstructed; people make sense of their world from within it, not detached from it. The presence of one's partner in a joint interview will therefore influence the experience of participants, and will also influence the descriptions they provide. In this article, we present a reflexive discussion of two studies in which we used Heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology to explore people's experiences of sexuality and intimacy within the context of their illness. We present the Heideggerian concepts of Dasein, authenticity and truth, and draw on extracts from our interview transcripts to exemplify the different effects of joint and one-to-one interviews. We also discuss ethical considerations regarding these different interview approaches. Heidegger's philosophy does not preferentially support either method, but helps us to be clearer about the merits and limitations of each approach. Combining both approaches provides richer understanding of phenomena.
海德格尔主义研究者认识到，人和他们的世界是共同构建的；人们从自己的世界中理解世界，而不是脱离世界。因此，在联合访谈中，参与者的伴侣的存在会影响他们的体验，也会影响他们提供的描述。在本文中，我们对两项研究进行了反思性讨论，我们在这两项研究中使用了海德格尔式的解释学现象学来探索人们在疾病背景下的性体验和亲密关系体验。我们介绍了 Dasein、真实性和真理的海德格尔概念，并从我们的访谈记录中摘录了一些内容，举例说明了联合访谈和一对一访谈的不同影响。我们还讨论了这些不同访谈方法的伦理考虑。海德格尔的哲学并不优先支持任何一种方法，而是帮助我们更清楚地了解每种方法的优点和局限性。结合这两种方法可以更深入地理解现象。
