• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在院外心脏骤停中使用救护车和消防服务双重派遣的早期除颤计划具有有利的成本效益。

Favourable cost-benefit in an early defibrillation programme using dual dispatch of ambulance and fire services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Swedish Business School, Örebro University, 702 82, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):811-8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0338-7. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-011-0338-7
PMID:21739334
Abstract

AIMS

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is fatal without treatment, and time to defibrillation is an extremely important factor in relation to survival. We performed a cost-benefit analysis of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm, Sweden.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cost-benefit analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of dual dispatch defibrillation. The increased survival rates were estimated from a real-world implemented intervention, and the monetary value of a life ( 2.2 million) was applied to this benefit by using results from a recent stated-preference study. The estimated costs include defibrillators (including expendables/maintenance), training, hospitalisation/health care, fire service call-outs, overhead resources and the dispatch centre. The estimated number of additional saved lives was 16 per year, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 36. The cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated to be 13,000, and the cost per saved life was 60,000.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm had positive economic effects. For the cost-benefit analysis, the return on investment was high and the cost-effectiveness showed levels below the threshold value for economic efficiency used in Sweden. The cost-utility analysis categorises the cost per QALY as medium.

摘要

目的

院外心脏骤停如果不治疗将是致命的,而除颤的时间与生存密切相关,是一个极其重要的因素。我们对瑞典斯德哥尔摩县的救护车和消防双重派遣除颤进行了成本效益分析。

方法和结果

进行了成本效益分析以评估双重派遣除颤的效果。从实际实施的干预措施中估计了生存率的提高,并且通过使用最近的陈述偏好研究的结果,将生命的货币价值(<欧元> 220 万)应用于这种收益。估计的成本包括除颤器(包括消耗品/维护)、培训、住院/医疗保健、消防服务出动、间接资源和调度中心。估计每年可额外挽救 16 条生命,效益成本比为 36。每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本估计为<欧元> 13000,每挽救生命的成本为<欧元> 60000。

结论

斯德哥尔摩县的救护车和消防双重派遣除颤干预具有积极的经济效益。对于成本效益分析,投资回报率很高,成本效益表明低于瑞典使用的经济效益阈值水平。成本效用分析将每 QALY 的成本归类为中等。

相似文献

1
Favourable cost-benefit in an early defibrillation programme using dual dispatch of ambulance and fire services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.在院外心脏骤停中使用救护车和消防服务双重派遣的早期除颤计划具有有利的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):811-8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0338-7. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
2
The implementation of a dual dispatch system in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved short and long term survival.在院外心脏骤停中实施双重调度系统与短期和长期生存率的提高相关。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):293-303. doi: 10.1177/2048872614532415. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Cost-effectiveness of public automated external defibrillators.公共自动体外除颤器的成本效益。
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
Dual dispatch early defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the SALSA-pilot.院外心脏骤停的双路调度早期除颤:SALSA试点研究
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1781-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp177. Epub 2009 May 27.
5
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
6
Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support.通过对现有除颤计划进行低成本优化提高院外心脏骤停存活率:OPALS研究第二阶段。安大略省院前高级生命支持。
JAMA. 1999 Apr 7;281(13):1175-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.13.1175.
7
Cost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest.公共场所除颤器在提高院外心脏骤停后生存率方面的成本效益和成本效用模型。
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1316.
8
Dual dispatch early defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a mixed urban-rural population.双调度在城乡混合人群的院外心脏骤停中早期除颤。
Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
Effectiveness of Prehospital Dual Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest.院前双相顺序除颤对难治性心室颤动和室性心动过速性心搏骤停的效果。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):597-602. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1584256. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Effect of Implementation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-Targeted Multi-Tier Response System on Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Before-and-After Population-Based Study.心肺复苏靶向多层反应系统实施对院外心脏骤停后结局的影响:一项基于人群的前后对照研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):220-231. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1624900. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of treating out of hospital cardiac arrest and the implications for resource-limited health systems.院外心脏骤停治疗成本效益的系统评价及其对资源有限卫生系统的影响。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 9;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00727-w.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Implications for Resource-limited Health Systems.院外心脏骤停治疗成本效益的系统评价:对资源有限的卫生系统的启示
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 4:rs.3.rs-4402626. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4402626/v1.
3
Dispatch of Firefighters and Police Officers in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Trial Using Propensity Score Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual dispatch early defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the SALSA-pilot.院外心脏骤停的双路调度早期除颤:SALSA试点研究
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1781-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp177. Epub 2009 May 27.
2
[Health economics evaluations are of great significance for Pharmaceutical Benefit Board's decisions].卫生经济学评估对药品福利委员会的决策具有重要意义。
Lakartidningen. 2007;104(42):3046-50.
3
An evaluation of post-resuscitation care as a possible explanation of a difference in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
院外心搏骤停患者中消防人员和警察的派遣:一项使用倾向评分分析的全国前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 4;6(10):e005873. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005873.
4
Developing an analytical tool for evaluating EMS system design changes and their impact on cardiac arrest outcomes: combining geographic information systems with register data on survival rates.开发一种分析工具,用于评估 EMS 系统设计变更及其对心脏骤停结局的影响:将地理信息系统与生存率登记数据相结合。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Feb 15;21:8. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-8.
对复苏后护理进行评估,以探究其是否可能解释院外心脏骤停后生存率差异的原因。
Resuscitation. 2007 Aug;74(2):242-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.12.014. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
4
Cost-benefit analysis of preventing sudden cardiac deaths with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone.植入式心脏复律除颤器与胺碘酮预防心源性猝死的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00140.x.
5
A comprehensive framework for determining the cost of an emergency medical services system.一个用于确定紧急医疗服务系统成本的综合框架。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):304-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
6
Economic value of out-of-hospital emergency care: a structured literature review.院外急救护理的经济价值:一项结构化文献综述。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.012. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
7
Methodological design for economic evaluation in Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial.公共除颤(PAD)试验中经济评估的方法学设计。
Am Heart J. 2005 Aug;150(2):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.034.
8
Cost-effectiveness of training unselected laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation.对未经挑选的非专业人员进行心肺复苏和除颤培训的成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 2005 Jan;118(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.08.014.
9
Health system costs of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to time to shock.院外心脏骤停的医疗系统成本与电击时间的关系。
Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1967-73. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143150.13727.19. Epub 2004 Sep 20.
10
Long term survival and costs per life year gained after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后的长期生存率及每获得一个生命年的成本。
Resuscitation. 2004 Jan;60(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00262-4.