King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine & Psychiatry, Section of Eating Disorders, UK.
Eat Behav. 2011 Aug;12(3):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
Whilst neuropsychological testing provides the most accurate profile of cognitive functioning, the time consuming nature of individual assessment deems it impossible for many research and clinical settings. This paper presents the development and validation of the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire (DFlex), a 24-item self-report scale measuring two aspects of neurocognitive functioning; cognitive rigidity (difficulty with set-shifting/flexibility) and attention to detail (weak coherence). Exploratory factor analysis extracted two subscales, further confirmed and refined by item response analysis. Both subscales showed high internal reliability, construct validity (as compared to relevant subscales of the Autistic-Spectrum Quotient) and strong discriminant validity with large effect sizes found between both lifetime eating disorder and healthy control groups, and between current and recovered anorexia nervosa. We suggest using the cognitive rigidity and attention to detail subscales independently to give a rough approximation of these two aspects of cognitive style as they manifest in the context of everyday life.
虽然神经心理学测试能提供最准确的认知功能概况,但由于个别评估耗时,在许多研究和临床环境中都不可行。本文介绍了详细和灵活性问卷(DFlex)的开发和验证,该问卷是一个 24 项的自我报告量表,用于测量神经认知功能的两个方面:认知僵化(转换/灵活性困难)和对细节的关注(弱连贯)。探索性因素分析提取了两个分量表,进一步通过项目反应分析得到确认和细化。两个分量表都显示出较高的内部一致性、结构有效性(与自闭症谱系商数的相关分量表相比),以及与大样本的进食障碍患者和健康对照组之间的强判别有效性,在进食障碍患者和健康对照组之间,以及当前和恢复的神经性厌食症患者之间都发现了较大的效应量。我们建议独立使用认知僵化和对细节的关注分量表,以粗略估计这两个方面的认知风格,因为它们在日常生活中表现出来。