Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚注册犬种的系谱调查。

A genealogical survey of Australian registered dog breeds.

机构信息

Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Vet J. 2011 Aug;189(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Abstract

Breeding practices were analysed for 32 registered dog breeds representing very small registries (120 Central Asian shepherd dogs) through to very large registries (252,521 German shepherd dogs) in Australia. The vast majority (91%) of registered kennels in Australia that were sampled did not regularly employ either close breeding or popular sire usage in their kennels and the weighted mean inbreeding coefficient of Australian pedigree dogs was <5%. Australian breed mean inbreeding coefficients ranged from 0% (Central Asian shepherd dog) to 10.1% (Bichon Frise). Breed effective population sizes ranged from 26 (Ibizan hound) to 1090 (Golden retriever), comparable with other species of domesticated animals. The relatively low levels of inbreeding suggest that pedigree dog disorders are unlikely to arise frequently from the use of popular sires or close breeding in Australian registered dog breeds. It is possible that deleterious allele fixation might be driven by founder effects, genetic drift or adverse selection practices, which were not assessed in this analysis. European popular sire definitions should be revisited for rare breeds.

摘要

对澳大利亚 32 个注册犬种进行了繁殖实践分析,这些犬种的注册数量从非常小的(120 只中亚牧羊犬)到非常大的(252521 只德国牧羊犬)。在抽样的澳大利亚注册犬舍中,绝大多数(91%)犬舍没有在其犬舍中定期采用近亲繁殖或流行的种公使用,澳大利亚血统犬的加权平均近交系数<5%。澳大利亚犬种的平均近交系数从 0%(中亚牧羊犬)到 10.1%(比熊犬)不等。犬种有效种群数量从 26 只(伊比沙猎犬)到 1090 只(金毛猎犬)不等,与其他家养动物物种相当。相对较低的近交程度表明,在澳大利亚注册的犬种中,使用流行的种公或近亲繁殖不太可能经常导致品种犬疾病的发生。有害等位基因的固定可能是由奠基者效应、遗传漂变或不利的选择实践驱动的,但在本分析中没有评估这些因素。应该重新审视欧洲流行种公的定义,以适用于稀有品种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验