Suppr超能文献

马胰岛素的商业检测方法评估。

Evaluation of commercially available assays for the measurement of equine insulin.

机构信息

School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2011 Aug;41(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 31.

Abstract

Determining circulating equine insulin concentrations is becoming increasingly important in equine clinical practice and research. Most available assays are optimized for human medicine, but there is strong equine cross-reactivity because of the highly conserved nature of insulin. To identify an accurate and reliable assay for equine insulin, 6 commercial immunoassays were evaluated for precision, accuracy, and specificity. Only 1 assay initially reached the requisite standard: Mercodia Equine Insulin Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plasma matrix interferences were identified when the provided assay buffer was used with the Siemens Count-a-Coat Insulin radioimmunoassay (RIA) but not when charcoal-stripped equine plasma was used as the diluent. This modified RIA and the Mercodia Equine Insulin ELISA were evaluated further by directly examining accuracy by comparing their results for 18 equine plasma samples with values obtained using liquid chromatography and high-resolution/high-accuracy mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Compared with LC-MS measurements, the modified Siemens Insulin RIA rendered a moderate Lin's concordance coefficient (ρ(c)) of 0.41, whereas the Mercodia Equine Insulin ELISA rendered a very poor ρ(c) of 0.06. This suggests that the Siemens Insulin RIA is appropriate to use for routine evaluations when LC-MS is not available.

摘要

测定循环马胰岛素浓度在马临床实践和研究中变得越来越重要。大多数可用的检测方法都是针对人类医学优化的,但由于胰岛素具有高度保守的性质,因此具有很强的马交叉反应性。为了确定一种准确可靠的马胰岛素检测方法,我们评估了 6 种商业免疫测定法的精密度、准确性和特异性。只有 1 种检测方法最初达到了必要的标准:Mercodia 马胰岛素酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)。当使用西门子 Count-a-Coat 胰岛素放射免疫测定法(RIA)的提供的检测缓冲液时,会发现血浆基质干扰,但当使用活性炭处理的马血浆作为稀释剂时,则不会发现干扰。进一步评估了这种改良的 RIA 和 Mercodia 马胰岛素 ELISA,通过将它们对 18 个马血浆样本的结果与使用液相色谱和高分辨率/高精度质谱(LC-MS)获得的值进行直接比较,来评估它们的准确性。与 LC-MS 测量结果相比,改良的西门子胰岛素 RIA 的 Lin 一致性系数(ρ(c))为 0.41,而 Mercodia 马胰岛素 ELISA 的 ρ(c)则非常差,为 0.06。这表明,当无法获得 LC-MS 时,西门子胰岛素 RIA 适合用于常规评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验