• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍的因素:差异特异性和外部相关性。

Factors of PTSD: differential specificity and external correlates.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):993-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.005
PMID:21741913
Abstract

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been found to be a multidimensional disorder most likely consisting of four distinct symptom dimensions. Many studies have investigated the fit of two competing structural models of PTSD (King et al., 1998; Simms et al., 2002). However, little research has been done on the utility and differential external correlates of these dimensions. Meta-analysis was used to find the correlations between dimensions of PTSD and five external variables (depression, anxiety, panic, substance use, and trauma history), and multivariate analysis was used to find the unique contributions of each dimension in predicting each variable. It was found that the Simms et al. (2002) model better divides PTSD symptoms into specific and general factors. The relative specificity of each factor is discussed.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)被发现是一种多维障碍,很可能由四个不同的症状维度组成。许多研究已经调查了 PTSD 的两种竞争结构模型(King 等人,1998 年;Simms 等人,2002 年)的拟合情况。然而,对于这些维度的实用性和差异外部相关性的研究很少。元分析用于发现 PTSD 维度与五个外部变量(抑郁、焦虑、惊恐、物质使用和创伤史)之间的相关性,多元分析用于发现每个维度对每个变量的预测的独特贡献。结果发现,Simms 等人(2002 年)的模型更好地将 PTSD 症状分为特定和一般因素。讨论了每个因素的相对特异性。

相似文献

1
Factors of PTSD: differential specificity and external correlates.创伤后应激障碍的因素:差异特异性和外部相关性。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):993-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Testing the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress responses in young Chinese adult earthquake survivors: further evidence for "dysphoric arousal" as a unique PTSD construct.检验中国青年成年地震幸存者创伤后应激反应的维度:“苦恼激越”作为 PTSD 独特结构的进一步证据。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Dec 21;28(12):1097-104. doi: 10.1002/da.20823. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
The symptom structure of posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Replication Survey.全国共病复制调查中创伤后应激障碍的症状结构
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
4
Assessing posttraumatic stress disorder with or without reference to a single, worst traumatic event: examining differences in factor structure.评估是否参考单一的最严重创伤事件的创伤后应激障碍:检验因子结构的差异。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):629-34. doi: 10.1037/a0016677.
5
Assessing a five factor model of PTSD: is dysphoric arousal a unique PTSD construct showing differential relationships with anxiety and depression?评估创伤后应激障碍的五因素模型:激越性唤起是否是一种独特的创伤后应激障碍结构,与焦虑和抑郁有不同的关系?
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Mar;26(2):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
6
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
7
Reconciling the differences between the King et al. (1998) and Simms et al. (2002) factor models of PTSD.调和金等人(1998年)与西姆斯等人(2002年)创伤后应激障碍因素模型之间的差异。
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Oct;23(7):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
8
Comparing alternative factor models of PTSD symptoms across earthquake victims and violent riot witnesses in China: evidence for a five-factor model proposed by Elhai et al. (2011).比较中国地震灾民和暴力骚乱目击者 PTSD 症状的替代因素模型:对 Elhai 等人(2011 年)提出的五因素模型的证据。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Aug;25(6):771-6. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
9
Comparing posttraumatic stress disorder's symptom structure between deployed and nondeployed veterans.比较部署和未部署退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状结构。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020045.
10
On comparing competing structural models of PTSD: comments on Miller et al.比较 PTSD 的竞争结构模型:对 Miller 等人的评论
J Trauma Stress. 2010 Oct;23(5):639-41; discussion 642-4. doi: 10.1002/jts.20567.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory factor analysis of post traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5: investigating post traumatic stress disorder interconnected dynamics with depression and anxiety in the aftermath of multiple collective stressors.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表的探索性因素分析:调查多重集体应激源后创伤后应激障碍与抑郁和焦虑的相互关联动态
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323422. eCollection 2025.
2
Comorbidity Patterns of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Symptoms: Cross-Validation in Two Postearthquake Child and Adolescent Samples.创伤后应激障碍与抑郁症状的共病模式:在两个地震后儿童和青少年样本中的交叉验证
Depress Anxiety. 2023 Nov 8;2023:4453663. doi: 10.1155/2023/4453663. eCollection 2023.
3
Analysis of the current status and factors influencing post-traumatic stress disorder in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.老年膝骨关节炎患者创伤后应激障碍的现状及影响因素分析:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95212-6.
4
Combat readiness, alcohol abuse, and posttraumatic stress disorder among Uganda peoples' defence forces soldiers.乌干达人民国防军士兵的战斗准备、酗酒和创伤后应激障碍。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 21;12(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02068-y.
5
From pregnancy to the postpartum: Unraveling the complexities of symptom profiles among trauma-exposed women.从怀孕到产后:揭开创伤后女性症状特征的复杂性。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 15;357:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.079. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Heart rate reactivity during trauma recall as a predictor of treatment outcome in cognitive processing therapy for PTSD.创伤回忆时的心率反应性作为 PTSD 的认知加工治疗中治疗效果的预测指标。
Behav Res Ther. 2024 May;176:104519. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104519. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
Post-traumatic stress disorder: a psychiatric disorder requiring urgent attention.创伤后应激障碍:一种需要紧急关注的精神障碍。
Med Rev (2021). 2022 Aug 2;2(3):219-243. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0012. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Associations of the Short-Form Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a Population-Based Sample of 29 021 Adult Men.在一个基于 29021 名成年男性的人口样本中,短式社区心理体验评估的心理计量特性和诊断关联性。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Sep 7;49(5):1229-1238. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad074.
9
The association among teacher-student relationship, subjective well-being, and academic achievement: Evidence from Chinese fourth graders and eighth graders.师生关系、主观幸福感与学业成绩之间的关联:来自中国四年级和八年级学生的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1097094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097094. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital Phenotyping for Differential Diagnosis of Major Depressive Episode: Narrative Review.用于重度抑郁发作鉴别诊断的数字表型分析:叙述性综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jan 23;10:e37225. doi: 10.2196/37225.