Disaster Mental Health Institute, University of South Dakota, SD, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020045.
We tested two empirically validated 4-factor models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms using the PTSD Checklist: King, Leskin, King, and Weathers' (1998) model including reexperiencing, avoidance, emotional numbing, and hyperarousal factors, and Simms, Watson, and Doebbeling's (2002) model including reexperiencing, avoidance, dysphoria, and hyperarousal. Our aim was to determine which fit better in two groups of military veterans: peacekeepers previously deployed to a war zone (deployed group) and those trained for peacekeeping operations who were not deployed (nondeployed group). We compared the groups using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Adequate model fit was demonstrated among the nondeployed group, with no significant difference between King et al.'s (1998) model (separating avoidance and numbing) and Simms et al.'s (2002) similar model involving a dysphoria factor. A better fitting factor structure consistent with Simms et al.'s (2002) model was found in the deployed group. Comprehensive measurement invariance testing demonstrated significant differences between the deployed and nondeployed groups on all structural parameters, except observed variable intercepts (thus indicating similarities only in PTSD item severity). These findings add to researchers' understanding of PTSD's factor structure, given the revision of PTSD that will appear in the forthcoming 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2010)--namely, that the factor structure may be quite different between groups with and without exposure to major traumatic events.
我们使用 PTSD 检查表测试了两种经验验证的 PTSD 症状 4 因素模型:King、Leskin、King 和 Weathers(1998)模型包括再体验、回避、情感麻木和过度警觉因素,以及 Simms、Watson 和 Doebbeling(2002)模型包括再体验、回避、抑郁和过度警觉。我们的目的是确定在两组退伍军人中哪种模型更适合:曾部署到战区的维和人员(部署组)和未部署的维和行动培训人员(未部署组)。我们使用多组验证性因素分析比较了这两个组。未部署组的模型拟合良好,King 等人(1998)的模型(区分回避和麻木)和 Simms 等人(2002)的类似模型中没有显著差异。在部署组中发现了与 Simms 等人(2002)的模型更一致的拟合因子结构。全面的测量不变性测试表明,部署组和未部署组在所有结构参数上存在显著差异,除了观察变量截距(因此仅表明 PTSD 项目严重程度相似)。鉴于即将出现的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第 5 版)(美国精神病学协会,2010 年)对 PTSD 的修订,这些发现增加了研究人员对 PTSD 因子结构的理解,即因子结构在暴露于重大创伤事件的组和未暴露于重大创伤事件的组之间可能有很大的不同。