• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调和金等人(1998年)与西姆斯等人(2002年)创伤后应激障碍因素模型之间的差异。

Reconciling the differences between the King et al. (1998) and Simms et al. (2002) factor models of PTSD.

作者信息

Shevlin Mark, McBride Orla, Armour Cherie, Adamson Gary

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ulster Magee Campus, Northland Road, Co. Londonderry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Oct;23(7):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.001
PMID:19632810
Abstract

Much of the debate surrounding the dimensionality of PTSD relates to three specific Hyperarousal symptoms (D1-D3) and whether they are appropriate indicators of one of two broad constructs that constitute PTSD: Dysphoria or Hyperarousal. This study addressed this issue by testing a series of confirmatory factor models to determine which factor, or factors, these symptoms measured the strongest. Data from individuals who satisfied the conditions for Criterion A of the diagnostic criteria for a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD (n=12,467) in the 2004-2005 NESARC were used in the analysis. The results revealed that the D1-D3 symptoms were not clear indicators of either factor, but measured both Dysphoria and Hyperarousal. Two symptoms, however, loaded more highly on the Dysphoria, rather than Hyperarousal, factor. The present findings lend support to the factor model proposed by Simms et al. [Simms, L. J., Watson, D., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2002). Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and non-deployed veterans of the Gulf War. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 637-647] but also question the use of symptoms that are not unique indicators of specific factors.

摘要

围绕创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)维度的许多争论都与三种特定的过度警觉症状(D1 - D3)以及它们是否是构成PTSD的两个宽泛结构之一(烦躁不安或过度警觉)的恰当指标有关。本研究通过测试一系列验证性因素模型来解决这个问题,以确定这些症状最强烈测量的是哪个因素或哪些因素。分析中使用了2004 - 2005年全国酒精与相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)中符合DSM - IV创伤后应激障碍诊断标准A标准条件的个体数据(n = 12,467)。结果显示,D1 - D3症状并非任何一个因素的明确指标,而是同时测量了烦躁不安和过度警觉。然而,有两种症状在烦躁不安因素上的负荷更高,而非过度警觉因素。本研究结果支持了西姆斯等人提出的因素模型[西姆斯,L. J.,沃森,D.,& 德布林,B. N.(2002年)。海湾战争参战和未参战退伍军人创伤后应激症状的验证性因素分析。《变态心理学杂志》,111,637 - 647],但也对使用并非特定因素独特指标的症状提出了质疑。

相似文献

1
Reconciling the differences between the King et al. (1998) and Simms et al. (2002) factor models of PTSD.调和金等人(1998年)与西姆斯等人(2002年)创伤后应激障碍因素模型之间的差异。
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Oct;23(7):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
2
The symptom structure of posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Replication Survey.全国共病复制调查中创伤后应激障碍的症状结构
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
3
Comparing posttraumatic stress disorder's symptom structure between deployed and nondeployed veterans.比较部署和未部署退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状结构。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020045.
4
Assessing posttraumatic stress disorder with or without reference to a single, worst traumatic event: examining differences in factor structure.评估是否参考单一的最严重创伤事件的创伤后应激障碍:检验因子结构的差异。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):629-34. doi: 10.1037/a0016677.
5
Longitudinal factor structure of posttraumatic stress symptoms related to intimate partner violence.与亲密伴侣暴力相关的创伤后应激症状的纵向因素结构
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):165-75. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.165.
6
Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms.存在一个独特的 PTSD 结构的证据,由 PTSD 的 D1-D3 症状代表。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
7
The structure of posttraumatic psychopathology in veterans attending primary care.创伤后精神病理学在初级保健就诊的退伍军人中的结构。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jan;26(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
8
Support for a novel five-factor model of posttraumatic stress symptoms in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans: a confirmatory factor analytic study.支持创伤后应激症状的新型五因素模型在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的应用:一项验证性因素分析研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
9
PTSD factor structure differences between veterans with and without a PTSD diagnosis.创伤后应激障碍患者与非创伤后应激障碍患者 PTSD 因子结构的差异。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Apr;26(3):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
10
Structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and psychosocial functioning in Veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.持久自由行动和伊拉克自由行动的退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状和社会心理功能的结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Profiles of Comorbid Depression as Predictors of PTSD Treatment Outcome.共病抑郁的潜在特征对 PTSD 治疗结果的预测。
Behav Ther. 2021 Jul;52(4):970-981. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Initiation of pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder among veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan: a dimensional, symptom cluster approach.伊拉克和阿富汗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的药物治疗启动:一种维度、症状群方法
BJPsych Open. 2016 Sep 9;2(5):286-293. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002451. eCollection 2016 Sep.
3
Consistency and factorial invariance of the Davidson trauma scale in heterogeneous populations: results from the 2010 Chilean earthquake.
不同人群中 Davidson 创伤量表的一致性和因子不变性:来自 2010 年智利地震的结果。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1516. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
4
PTSD's Underlying Dimensions in Typhoon Haiyan Survivors: Assessing DSM-5 Symptomatology-Based PTSD Models and Their Relation to Posttraumatic Cognition.台风海燕幸存者创伤后应激障碍的潜在维度:评估基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版症状学的创伤后应激障碍模型及其与创伤后认知的关系。
Psychiatr Q. 2017 Mar;88(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s11126-016-9429-z.
5
Negative Social Relationships Predict Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Among War-Affected Children Via Posttraumatic Cognitions.消极的社会关系通过创伤后认知预测受战争影响儿童的创伤后应激症状。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Jul;44(5):845-57. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0070-3.
6
Examining the Latent Structure of Acute Stress Disorder Symptoms in Filipino-Victims of a Flashflood Disaster.探究菲律宾山洪灾害受害者急性应激障碍症状的潜在结构。
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Jul;51(5):613-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9826-z. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
7
Factor structure of PTSD, and relation with gender in trauma survivors from India.创伤后应激障碍的因子结构及其与印度创伤幸存者中性别之间的关系。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Nov 17;5:25547. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25547. eCollection 2014.
8
Gender differences in the long-term associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms: findings from the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study.创伤后应激障碍与抑郁症状长期关联中的性别差异:底特律邻里健康研究的结果
Depress Anxiety. 2015 Jan;32(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/da.22267. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
9
Symptom structure of PTSD: support for a hierarchical model separating core PTSD symptoms from dysphoria.创伤后应激障碍的症状结构:支持从抑郁中将核心 PTSD 症状分离出来的层级模型。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2012;3. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.17580. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
10
Latent classes of adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder predict functioning and disorder after 1 year.青少年创伤后应激障碍的潜在类别可预测 1 年后的功能和障碍。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;50(4):364-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 22.