New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Am Heart J. 2011 Jul;162(1):98-105.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.015.
The association between bleeding severity and cause of mortality in the non-acute setting is unclear. We sought to investigate the association between bleeding and mortality subtype, and assess whether this association differs in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus aspirin alone.
Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival regression, we examined the association between moderate or severe bleeding and all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in 15,603 patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors enrolled in the CHARISMA trial.
Patients with moderate or severe bleeding had a higher incidence of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality (P < .001 for each). After multivariable adjustment, moderate/severe bleeding remained independently associated with not only all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.21) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.38-3.04) but also cancer mortality (HR 4.76, 95% CI 2.60-8.69). However, there was a significant interaction between bleeding and potency of antiplatelet therapy for all-cause (P = .002), cardiovascular (P = .02), and cancer mortality (P = .03); in subjects on aspirin alone, moderate/severe bleeding was associated with all-cause (HR 5.27, 95% CI 3.56-7.80), cardiovascular (HR 4.33, 95% CI 2.55-7.37), and cancer mortality (HR 9.01, 95% CI 4.41-18.43), but not in subjects on DAPT (all-cause: HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.93-2.34; cardiovascular: HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.58-1.86; and cancer mortality: HR 1.79, 95% CI 0.56-5.74).
In stable patients, moderate or severe bleeding is associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. However, this risk appeared different in subjects on single antiplatelet therapy versus DAPT.
非急性环境下,出血严重程度与死亡原因之间的关联尚不清楚。我们旨在研究出血与全因、心血管和癌症死亡亚型之间的关系,并评估在双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)与单独使用阿司匹林的患者中,这种关联是否存在差异。
我们使用多变量 Cox 比例风险生存回归,检查了 CHARISMA 试验中 15603 例患有心血管疾病或多种危险因素的患者中,中度或重度出血与全因、心血管和癌症死亡之间的关系。
有中度或重度出血的患者全因、心血管和癌症死亡率均较高(每项 P<0.001)。经多变量调整后,中度/重度出血与全因死亡率(调整后的危险比[HR] 1.66;95%置信区间[CI] 1.24-2.21)和心血管死亡率(HR 2.05,95%CI 1.38-3.04)显著相关,也与癌症死亡率相关(HR 4.76,95%CI 2.60-8.69)。然而,出血与抗血小板治疗强度之间存在全因(P=0.002)、心血管(P=0.02)和癌症死亡率(P=0.03)的显著交互作用;在单独使用阿司匹林的患者中,中度/重度出血与全因(HR 5.27,95%CI 3.56-7.80)、心血管(HR 4.33,95%CI 2.55-7.37)和癌症死亡率(HR 9.01,95%CI 4.41-18.43)相关,但在使用 DAPT 的患者中则无相关性(全因:HR 1.48,95%CI 0.93-2.34;心血管:HR 1.04,95%CI 0.58-1.86;癌症死亡率:HR 1.79,95%CI 0.56-5.74)。
在稳定的患者中,中度或重度出血与全因、心血管和癌症死亡的风险显著增加相关。然而,在单独使用抗血小板药物与 DAPT 的患者中,这种风险似乎存在差异。