Duan Shu, Liu Yiqun, Xiao Jing, Zhao Shuiping, Zhu Xiongzhao
Department of Cardiology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Jun;36(6):532-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2011.06.010.
To examine the reliability,validity,and practicability of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in hypertensive patients in China.
Altogether 434 hypertensive patients and 462 healthy subjects were recruited. All the subjects were assessed with the CERQ-Chinese version (CERQ-C), Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS), Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire-Short Form (MASQ-SF), and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). We calculated the mean inter-item correlations for the total CERQ and for each of the subscales. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to analyze the inter-correlation and reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the 9-factor model.
CERQ meets the psychometric standard and it is reliable and valid for cognitive emotion regulation strategies, which may be regarded as an appropriate assessment tool.
检验认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)在中国高血压患者中的信度、效度和实用性。
共招募了434例高血压患者和462例健康受试者。所有受试者均接受中文版CERQ(CERQ-C)、功能失调性态度量表(DAS)、情绪与焦虑症状问卷简表(MASQ-SF)以及流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的评估。我们计算了CERQ总量表及各分量表的平均项目间相关性。采用克朗巴哈α系数分析内部相关性和信度,并使用验证性因素分析检验九因素模型。
1)高血压组在沉思(12.19±2.51 vs. 11.51±2.60,P<0.001)、灾难化(8.82±2.19 vs. 8.11±2.70,P<0.001)和责备他人(10.76±2.11 vs. 9.88±2.48,P<0.001)方面的得分显著高于健康组,而在积极重新评价方面的得分显著低于健康组(13.80±3.55 vs. 14.71±4.11,P<0.001)。2)信度:高血压组中,CERQ总量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.80,9个分量表的克朗巴哈α系数范围为0.71(自我责备)至0.90(沉思)。健康组中,CERQ总量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.79,9个分量表的克朗巴哈α系数范围为0.71(积极重新评价)至0.90(沉思)。9个分量表的平均项目间相关系数为0.21 - 0.42(高血压组)/0.19 - 0.32(健康组)。在高血压组中,总量表的重测信度为0.82,9个分量表的重测信度范围为0.73至0.92。验证性因素分析表明,九因素一阶因子数据与两个样本均拟合良好。
CERQ符合心理测量标准,对于认知情绪调节策略具有可靠的信度和效度,可被视为一种合适的评估工具。