• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将一名经济学家融入地区和农村卫生服务机构,通过改善地方层面的决策来增加价值并减少浪费:“嵌入式经济学家”项目及评估方案

Embedding an economist in regional and rural health services to add value and reduce waste by improving local-level decision-making: protocol for the 'embedded Economist' program and evaluation.

作者信息

Searles Andrew, Piper Donella, Jorm Christine, Reeves Penny, Gleeson Maree, Karnon Jonathan, Goodwin Nicholas, Lawson Kenny, Iedema Rick, Gray Jane

机构信息

Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

New South Wales Regional Health Partners, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06181-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06181-1
PMID:33676496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7936595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic approaches to the inclusion of economic evaluation in national healthcare decision-making are usual. It is less common for economic evaluation to be routinely undertaken at the 'local-level' (e.g. in a health service or hospital) despite the largest proportion of health care expenditure being determined at this service level and recognition by local health service decision makers of the need for capacity building in economic evaluation skills. This paper describes a novel program - the embedded Economist (eE) Program. The eE Program aims to increase local health service staff awareness of, and develop their capacity to access and apply, economic evaluation principles in decision making. The eE program evaluation is also described. The aim of the evaluation is to capture the contextual, procedural and relational aspects that assist and detract from the eE program aims; as well as the outcomes and impact from the specific eE projects.

METHODS

The eE Program consists of a embedding a health economist in six health services and the provision of supported education in applied economic evaluation, provided via a community of practice and a university course. The embedded approach is grounded in co-production, embedded researchers and 'slow science'. The sites, participants, and program design are described. The program evaluation includes qualitative data collection via surveys, semi-structured interviews, observations and field diaries. In order to share interim findings, data are collected and analysed prior, during and after implementation of the eE program, at each of the six health service sites. The surveys will be analysed by calculating frequencies and descriptive statistics. A thematic analysis will be conducted on interview, observation and filed diary data. The Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) is utilised to assess the overall impact of the eE Program.

DISCUSSION

This program and evaluation will contribute to knowledge about how best to build capacity and skills in economic evaluation amongst decision-makers working in local-level health services. It will examine the extent to which participants are able to improve their ability to utilise evidence to inform decisions, avoid waste and improve the value of care delivery.

摘要

背景

在国家医疗保健决策中纳入经济评估的系统方法很常见。尽管大部分医疗保健支出是在“地方层面”(如在卫生服务机构或医院)确定的,且地方卫生服务决策者也认识到经济评估技能能力建设的必要性,但在地方层面常规开展经济评估的情况却较少见。本文介绍了一个新颖的项目——嵌入式经济学家(eE)项目。eE项目旨在提高地方卫生服务人员对经济评估原则的认识,并培养他们在决策中获取和应用这些原则的能力。本文还描述了eE项目评估。评估的目的是了解有助于和阻碍eE项目目标实现的背景、程序和关系方面的情况;以及特定eE项目的成果和影响。

方法

eE项目包括在六个卫生服务机构中派驻一名卫生经济学家,并通过实践社区和大学课程提供应用经济评估方面的支持性教育。这种嵌入式方法以共同生产、嵌入式研究人员和“慢科学”为基础。文中描述了项目地点、参与者和项目设计。项目评估包括通过调查、半结构化访谈、观察和实地日记收集定性数据。为了分享中期研究结果,在eE项目实施前、实施期间和实施后,在六个卫生服务机构中的每一个机构收集并分析数据。调查将通过计算频率和描述性统计进行分析。将对访谈、观察和实地日记数据进行主题分析。利用转化性健康研究影响评估框架(FAIT)来评估eE项目的总体影响。

讨论

该项目及其评估将有助于了解如何最好地在地方层面卫生服务机构工作的决策者中建立经济评估能力和技能。它将研究参与者在多大程度上能够提高利用证据为决策提供信息、避免浪费和提高医疗服务价值的能力。

相似文献

1
Embedding an economist in regional and rural health services to add value and reduce waste by improving local-level decision-making: protocol for the 'embedded Economist' program and evaluation.将一名经济学家融入地区和农村卫生服务机构,通过改善地方层面的决策来增加价值并减少浪费:“嵌入式经济学家”项目及评估方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06181-1.
2
Relational aspects of building capacity in economic evaluation in an Australian Primary Health Network using an embedded researcher approach.利用嵌入式研究人员方法在澳大利亚初级卫生网络中进行经济评估能力建设的关系方面。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08208-7.
3
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)7:在当地医疗环境中支持工作人员进行循证决策、实施和评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2388-8.
4
Rationing is a reality in rural physiotherapy: a qualitative exploration of service level decision-making.配给制在农村物理治疗中是现实存在的:对服务层面决策的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 27;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0786-3.
5
How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study.将研究证据和评估纳入地方卫生政策实施有多难?一项混合方法研究的结果。
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 12;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-17.
6
Embedding implementation research to enhance health policy and systems: a multi-country analysis from ten settings in Latin America and the Caribbean.嵌入实施研究以加强卫生政策和体系:拉丁美洲和加勒比十个国家的多国分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Oct 15;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0484-4.
7
Service Level Decision-making in Rural Physiotherapy: Development of Conceptual Models.农村物理治疗中的服务水平决策:概念模型的开发
Physiother Res Int. 2016 Jun;21(2):116-26. doi: 10.1002/pri.1627. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Health system decision-makers at the helm of implementation research: development of a framework to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of embedded approaches.卫生系统决策者主导实施研究:评估嵌入式方法的过程和效果的框架的制定。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00579-9.
9
Wiisokotaatiwin: development and evaluation of a community-based palliative care program in Naotkamegwanning First Nation.威索科塔蒂温:在瑙特卡梅格万宁第一民族开展的基于社区的姑息治疗项目的开发与评估
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Apr;18(2):4317. doi: 10.22605/RRH4317. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
When Health Systems Consider Research to Be Beyond the Scope of Healthcare Delivery, Research Translation Is Crippled Comment on "Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study".当卫生系统认为研究超出了医疗保健提供的范围时,研究转化就会受到阻碍 评“学术卫生科学中心是否是澳大利亚知识转化的载体?一项定性研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jun 1;11(6):855-858. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.104.

本文引用的文献

1
Scoping review of Australian evaluations of healthcare delivery models: are we making the most of the evidence?澳大利亚医疗服务提供模式评价的范围综述:我们是否充分利用了现有证据?
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Aug;44(4):557-562. doi: 10.1071/AH19188.
2
Does quality improvement improve quality?质量改进能否提升质量?
Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):191-194. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191.
3
Strengthening and measuring research impact in global health: lessons from applying the FAIT framework.加强和衡量全球健康研究的影响力:应用 FAIT 框架的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 May 6;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0451-0.
4
Applying an Implementation Framework to the Use of Evidence from Economic Evaluations in Making Healthcare Decisions.将实施框架应用于医疗保健决策中使用经济评估证据。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Aug;17(4):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00477-4.
5
Building the capacity - examining the impact of evidence-based public health trainings in Europe: a mixed methods approach.建立能力——考察欧洲循证公共卫生培训的影响:一种混合方法。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):45-53. doi: 10.1177/1757975918811102. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
The status of health economic evaluation within decision making in Austria.奥地利决策过程中健康经济评估的现状。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Sep;169(11-12):271-283. doi: 10.1007/s10354-019-0689-8. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
The time has come: Embedded implementation research for health care improvement.是时候了:为改善医疗保健进行嵌入式实施研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):373-380. doi: 10.1111/jep.13100. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model.拥抱复杂性和不确定性以产生影响:通过开发社会影响模型探索共同产生的研究的过程和变革潜力。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 11;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0375-0.
9
Understanding and Evaluating the Implementation of Integrated Care: A 'Three Pipe' Problem.理解与评估综合护理的实施:一个“三管齐下”的问题。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Dec 31;16(4):19. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2609.
10
Performing Economic Evaluation of Integrated Care: Highway to Hell or Stairway to Heaven?对综合医疗进行经济评估:通往地狱之路还是通往天堂的阶梯?
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 19;16(4):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2472.