Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan, China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 26;108(30):12343-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103353108. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
The marked biogeographic difference between western (Malay Peninsula and Sumatra) and eastern (Borneo) Sundaland is surprising given the long time that these areas have formed a single landmass. A dispersal barrier in the form of a dry savanna corridor during glacial maxima has been proposed to explain this disparity. However, the short duration of these dry savanna conditions make it an unlikely sole cause for the biogeographic pattern. An additional explanation might be related to the coarse sandy soils of central Sundaland. To test these two nonexclusive hypotheses, we performed a floristic cluster analysis based on 111 tree inventories from Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, and Borneo. We then identified the indicator genera for clusters that crossed the central Sundaland biogeographic boundary and those that did not cross and tested whether drought and coarse-soil tolerance of the indicator genera differed between them. We found 11 terminal floristic clusters, 10 occurring in Borneo, 5 in Sumatra, and 3 in Peninsular Malaysia. Indicator taxa of clusters that occurred across Sundaland had significantly higher coarse-soil tolerance than did those from clusters that occurred east or west of central Sundaland. For drought tolerance, no such pattern was detected. These results strongly suggest that exposed sandy sea-bed soils acted as a dispersal barrier in central Sundaland. However, we could not confirm the presence of a savanna corridor. This finding makes it clear that proposed biogeographic explanations for plant and animal distributions within Sundaland, including possible migration routes for early humans, need to be reevaluated.
马来半岛和苏门答腊岛与东部的婆罗洲之间存在明显的生物地理差异,这令人惊讶,因为这些地区已经形成了一个单一的大陆块很长时间了。有人提出,在冰期最大值时,一条干燥的热带稀树草原走廊的扩散屏障可以解释这种差异。然而,这些干燥的热带稀树草原条件持续时间很短,不太可能是造成这种生物地理格局的唯一原因。另一个解释可能与中心苏门答腊的粗砂土壤有关。为了检验这两个非排他性假说,我们基于来自马来半岛、苏门答腊和婆罗洲的 111 个树木清查数据进行了植物区系聚类分析。然后,我们确定了跨越中心苏门答腊生物地理边界的聚类的指示属,以及那些没有跨越边界的聚类的指示属,并检验了这些指示属的耐旱性和耐粗土性是否存在差异。我们发现了 11 个终端植物区系聚类,其中 10 个发生在婆罗洲,5 个发生在苏门答腊,3 个发生在马来半岛。发生在苏门答腊的聚类的指示类群具有显著更高的耐粗土性,而发生在苏门答腊东西两侧聚类的指示类群则没有。在耐旱性方面,没有发现这种模式。这些结果强烈表明,暴露的砂质海底土壤在中心苏门答腊充当了扩散屏障。然而,我们无法确认存在热带稀树草原走廊。这一发现清楚地表明,需要重新评估关于苏门答腊岛内植物和动物分布的生物地理解释,包括早期人类可能的迁徙路线。