Daemeter Consulting, Bogor, Indonesia.
Carbon Balance Manag. 2010 Nov 23;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-5-7.
Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tropics also harbour more than half the world's threatened species, raising the possibility that reducing GHG emissions by curtailing tropical deforestation could provide substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. Here we explore the potential for such co-benefits in Indonesia, a leading source of GHG emissions from land cover and land use change, and among the most species-rich countries in the world. We show that focal ecosystems for interventions to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia do not coincide with areas supporting the most species-rich communities or highest concentration of threatened species. We argue that inherent trade-offs among ecosystems in emission reduction potential, opportunity cost of foregone development and biodiversity values will require a regulatory framework to balance emission reduction interventions with biodiversity co-benefit targets. We discuss how such a regulatory framework might function, and caution that pursuing emission reduction strategies without such a framework may undermine, not enhance, long-term prospects for biodiversity conservation in the tropics.
热带森林砍伐和退化是全球温室气体(GHG)排放的主要来源。热带地区还拥有超过一半的世界受威胁物种,这增加了通过减少热带森林砍伐来减少温室气体排放可能为生物多样性保护带来巨大的共同效益的可能性。在这里,我们探讨了印度尼西亚这种共同效益的潜力,印度尼西亚是土地覆盖和土地利用变化导致温室气体排放的主要来源之一,也是世界上物种最丰富的国家之一。我们表明,印度尼西亚减少森林砍伐和森林退化排放的干预措施的重点生态系统与支持物种最丰富的社区或受威胁物种最集中的地区并不一致。我们认为,在减排潜力、放弃发展的机会成本和生物多样性价值之间存在内在的权衡,这将需要一个监管框架来平衡减排干预措施与生物多样性共同效益目标。我们讨论了这种监管框架如何运作,并警告说,在没有这种框架的情况下推行减排战略,可能会破坏而不是增强热带地区生物多样性保护的长期前景。