Department of Photobiology, Division of Molecular, Cellular Imaging, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Circ J. 2011;75(9):2187-95. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-1272. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Myocardial perfusion and fatty acid imaging have played important roles in the risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, visual image assessment requires considerable experience and training. Therefore, an automated program has been developed that can quantify perfusion and fatty acid uptake on myocardial single emission computed tomography (SPECT). The present study aimed to validate the automated quantitative program.
A total of 50 patients were studied with known or suspected CAD who underwent stress ²⁰¹Thallium (²⁰¹Tl) and resting ¹²³I-labelled β-methyl iodophenyl pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) SPECT. The SPECT images were quantified in 17 segments visually and using our Heart Score View software. Values were compared with those in a normal Japanese database and calculated summed stress (SSS), summed rest (SRS), summed difference (SDS), and summed BMIPP scores for each modality. Summed scores obtained using standard visual analysis and Heart Score View significantly correlated (²⁰¹Tl: SSS: r=0.934; SRS: r=0.827; SDS: r=0.743 summed BMIPP score: r=0.913) (each P<0.001) and Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between the 2 approaches.
Correlations between scores determined using Heart Score View software and standard visual interpretation were linear for both perfusion and fatty acid images. Thus, our new automated program might be useful for the risk stratification of patients with CAD in the clinical setting.
心肌灌注和脂肪酸显像是冠心病(CAD)患者风险分层的重要手段。然而,视觉图像评估需要丰富的经验和培训。因此,开发了一种可以对心肌单发射型计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的灌注和脂肪酸摄取进行定量分析的自动程序。本研究旨在验证该自动定量程序。
对 50 例已知或疑似 CAD 的患者进行了研究,这些患者接受了应激 ²⁰¹铊(²⁰¹Tl)和静息 ¹²³I 标记的β-甲基碘代十五烷酸(BMIPP)SPECT。通过视觉和我们的 Heart Score View 软件对 SPECT 图像进行了 17 节段的定量分析。将这些值与正常日本数据库中的值进行了比较,并计算了每种模式的总和应激(SSS)、总和静息(SRS)、总和差异(SDS)和总和 BMIPP 评分。标准视觉分析和 Heart Score View 获得的总和评分之间存在显著相关性(²⁰¹Tl:SSS:r=0.934;SRS:r=0.827;SDS:r=0.743 总和 BMIPP 评分:r=0.913)(均 P<0.001),Bland-Altman 分析显示两种方法之间具有良好的一致性。
Heart Score View 软件确定的评分与标准视觉解释之间的相关性对于灌注和脂肪酸图像都是线性的。因此,我们的新自动程序可能对临床 CAD 患者的风险分层有用。