Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Dec;77(12):1190-6. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
Fluid resuscitation is an essential aspect of the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, especially in the early stages of disease. Which fluid should be used for this purpose has been a topic of ongoing and sometimes heated debate for many years, yet this is still little evidence to support one fluid over another. Each fluid type has specific adverse effects, and all fluids when given in excess can be detrimental. In this article, we will review the advantages and limitations of the key fluid types currently used for the resuscitation of critically ill patients with sepsis, including the crystalloids (saline solutions and Ringer's lactate), and the colloids (albumin, gelatins, dextrans, and hydroxyethyl starches). We will then briefly summarize the limited evidence to support use of one fluid type over another, and provide general suggestions for fluid use in these patients.
液体复苏是严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者管理的重要方面,尤其是在疾病的早期阶段。为此目的应使用哪种液体多年来一直是一个持续存在且有时存在激烈争论的话题,但目前仍几乎没有证据支持某一种液体优于另一种液体。每种液体类型都有其特定的不良反应,所有液体过量使用都会造成损害。在本文中,我们将回顾目前用于严重脓毒症患者复苏的关键液体类型的优缺点,包括晶体液(生理盐水和乳酸林格氏液)和胶体液(白蛋白、明胶、右旋糖酐和羟乙基淀粉)。然后,我们将简要总结支持使用某一种液体类型而非另一种液体类型的有限证据,并为这些患者的液体使用提供一般建议。