儿童饮食障碍严重程度访谈评定量表：心理测量学特性及与 EDI-2 症状指数的比较。
Rating of Eating Disorder Severity Interview for Children: psychometric properties and comparison with EDI-2 symptom index.
机构信息
College of Nursing, Seattle University, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
出版信息
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Jan;20(1):e70-7. doi: 10.1002/erv.1115. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the psychometrics of the Rating of Eating Disorder Severity Interview for Children (REDS-C) and compare it with the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 symptom index.
METHODS
The psychometrics of the REDS-C were analyzed utilizing data from 336 patients, of ages 8 to 18 years. Receiver operator curve analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of the REDS-C and the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 symptom index to discriminate severity of eating disorder symptoms in relationship to an objective standard, defined as hospitalisation for medical stabilisation beyond 1 week.
RESULTS
Three factors were identified using 14 of the 16 original REDS-C items. Resulting subscales demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. The receiver operator curve results demonstrated the usefulness of the 14-item version of the REDS-C in predicting hospitalisation greater than 7 days as an indicator of symptom severity.
DISCUSSION
The 14-item REDS-C is a reliable tool to assist clinicians in evaluating the severity of eating disorder symptoms in children and adolescents.
目的
本研究旨在评估儿童饮食障碍严重程度访谈量表（REDS-C）的心理计量学特性，并将其与饮食障碍量表-2 症状指数进行比较。
方法
利用来自 336 名 8 至 18 岁患者的数据，分析了 REDS-C 的心理计量学特性。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估了 REDS-C 和饮食障碍量表-2 症状指数在与客观标准（定义为因医疗稳定需要住院超过 1 周）相关的饮食障碍症状严重程度方面的区分能力。
结果
使用 REDS-C 的 16 个原始项目中的 14 个项目确定了三个因素。由此产生的分量表表现出了可接受的信度和效度。受试者工作特征曲线结果表明，14 项 REDS-C 版本在预测住院时间超过 7 天作为症状严重程度的指标方面具有实用性。
讨论
14 项 REDS-C 是一种可靠的工具，可以帮助临床医生评估儿童和青少年饮食障碍症状的严重程度。
Zotero 插件