Eberenz K P, Gleaves D H
Renfrew Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Dec;16(4):371-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199412)16:4<371::aid-eat2260160406>3.0.co;2-w.
We examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the newly revised version of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI), with particular emphasis on the examination of the three new provisional scales: Asceticism, Impulse Regulation, and Social Insecurity. Subjects were 300 women who were seeking treatment at a residential treatment facility for women with eating disorders. Chronbach's alphas ranged from .80 to .91 for the eight original scales whereas coefficients for the three new scales were all less than .80, the criterion stated as being necessary for inclusion in the test. Item-total correlations were also substantially lower for the three new scales. The results of principal components analyses with orthogonal rotation supported the factor structure of the original 64-item EDI, but not the three additional scales. These data generally supported the reliability and factor structure of the original eight scales but did not support the reliability or validity of the three provisional scales.
我们检验了新版《饮食失调量表》(EDI)的内部一致性和因子结构,尤其着重检验了三个新的临时量表:苦行主义、冲动调节和社交不安全感。研究对象为300名在一家女性饮食失调住院治疗机构寻求治疗的女性。八个原始量表的克朗巴赫α系数在0.80至0.91之间,而三个新量表的系数均低于0.80,该标准被认为是纳入该测试所必需的。三个新量表的项目与总分的相关性也显著更低。采用正交旋转的主成分分析结果支持了最初64项EDI的因子结构,但不支持另外三个量表。这些数据总体上支持了最初八个量表的信度和因子结构,但不支持三个临时量表的信度或效度。