Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster 3108, Victoria, Australia.
Resuscitation. 2011 Nov;82(11):1393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
To examine the impact of changing dispatcher CPR instructions (400 compressions: 2 breaths, followed by 100:2 ratio) on rates of bystander CPR and survival in adults with presumed cardiac out-of-hospital arrest (OHCA) in Melbourne, Australia.
The Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry (VACAR) was searched for OHCA where Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attempted CPR between August 2006 and August 2009. OHCA included were: (1) patients aged ≥18 years old; (2) presumed cardiac etiology; and (3) not witnessed by EMS.
For the pre- and post-study periods, 1021 and 2101 OHCAs met inclusion criteria, respectively. Rates of bystander CPR increased overall (45-55%, p<0.001) and by initial rhythm (shockable 55-70%, p<0.001 and non-shockable 40-46%, p=0.01). In VF/VT OHCA, there were improvements in the number of patients arriving at hospital with a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (48-56%, p=0.02) and in survival to hospital discharge (21-29%, p=0.002), with improved outcomes restricted to patients receiving bystander CPR. After adjusting for factors associated with survival, the period of time following the change in CPR instructions was a significant predictor of survival to hospital discharge in VF/VT patients (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.20, p=0.005).
Following changes to dispatcher CPR instructions, significant increases were seen in rates of bystander CPR and improvements were seen in survival in VF/VT patients who received bystander CPR, after adjusting for factors associated with survival.
为了研究改变调度员心肺复苏(CPR)指令(400 次按压:2 次呼吸,随后 100:2 比例)对澳大利亚墨尔本成人疑似院外心脏骤停(OHCA)旁观者 CPR 率和存活率的影响。
维多利亚救护车心脏骤停登记处(VACAR)搜索了 2006 年 8 月至 2009 年 8 月期间 EMS 尝试进行 CPR 的 OHCA。OHCA 包括:(1)年龄≥18 岁的患者;(2)疑似心脏病因;(3)未被 EMS 目击。
在研究前后期间,分别有 1021 例和 2101 例 OHCA 符合纳入标准。旁观者 CPR 率总体上有所增加(45-55%,p<0.001),并按初始节律增加(可电击性 55-70%,p<0.001 和非可电击性 40-46%,p=0.01)。在 VF/VT OHCA 中,到达医院时出现自主循环恢复(ROSC)的患者数量有所增加(48-56%,p=0.02),存活率也有所提高(21-29%,p=0.002),改善仅限于接受旁观者 CPR 的患者。在校正与生存相关的因素后,CPR 指令改变后的时间段是 VF/VT 患者存活至出院的重要预测因素(OR 1.57,95%CI:1.15-2.20,p=0.005)。
在改变调度员 CPR 指令后,旁观者 CPR 率显著增加,接受旁观者 CPR 的 VF/VT 患者的存活率也有所提高,这在考虑了与生存相关的因素后。