Suppr超能文献

采用医疗优先调度系统压缩优先调度员辅助心肺复苏协议的首次按压时间。

Time to first compression using Medical Priority Dispatch System compression-first dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocols.

机构信息

Wake County EMS, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):242-50. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.616259. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Without bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), cardiac arrest survival decreases 7%-10% for every minute of delay until defibrillation. Dispatcher-assisted CPR (D-CPR) has been shown to increase the rates of bystander CPR and cardiac arrest survival. Other reports suggest that the most critical component of bystander CPR is chest compressions with minimal interruption. Beginning with version 11.2 of the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) protocols, instructions for mouth-to-mouth ventilation (MTMV) and pulse check were removed and a compression-first pathway was introduced to facilitate rapid delivery of compressions. Additionally, unconscious choking and third-trimester pregnancy decision-making criteria were added in versions 11.3 and 12.0, respectively. However, the effects of these changes on time to first compression (TTFC) have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to quantify the TTFC of MPDS versions 11.2, 11.3, and 12.0 for all calls identified as cardiac arrest on call intake that did not require MTMV instruction.

METHODS

Audio recordings of all D-CPR events for October 2005 through May 2010 were analyzed for TTFC. Differences in TTFC across versions were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

A total of 778 cases received D-CPR. Of these, 259 were excluded because they met criteria for MTMV (pediatric patients, allergic reaction, etc.), were missing data, or were not initially identified as cardiac arrest. Of the remaining 519 calls, the mean TTFC was 240 seconds, with no significant variation across the MPDS versions (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Following the removal of instructions for pulse check and MTMV, as well as other minor changes in the MPDS protocols, we found the overall TTFC to be 240 seconds with little variation across the three versions evaluated. This represents an improvement in TTFC compared with reports of an earlier version of MPDS that included pulse checks and MTMV instructions (315 seconds). However, the MPDS TTFC does not compare favorably with reports of older, non-MPDS protocols that included pulse checks and MTMV. Efforts should continue to focus on improving this key, and modifiable, determinant of cardiac arrest survival.

摘要

简介

如果没有旁观者心肺复苏(CPR),每延迟除颤一分钟,心脏骤停的存活率就会降低 7%-10%。调度员辅助 CPR(D-CPR)已被证明可以提高旁观者 CPR 的比例和心脏骤停的存活率。其他报告表明,旁观者 CPR 最关键的部分是尽量减少中断的胸部按压。从医疗优先调度系统(MPDS)协议的版本 11.2 开始,口对口通气(MTMV)和脉搏检查的说明被删除,并引入了先按压后通气的途径,以方便快速进行按压。此外,在版本 11.3 和 12.0 中分别添加了无意识窒息和妊娠晚期的决策标准。然而,这些变化对首次按压时间(TTFC)的影响尚未得到评估。

目的

我们旨在量化所有在接听电话时被识别为心脏骤停且不需要 MTMV 指导的电话的 MPDS 版本 11.2、11.3 和 12.0 的 TTFC。

方法

对 2005 年 10 月至 2010 年 5 月的所有 D-CPR 事件的音频记录进行分析,以确定 TTFC。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较版本间 TTFC 的差异。

结果

共有 778 例接受 D-CPR。其中 259 例因需要 MTMV(儿科患者、过敏反应等)、数据缺失或最初未被识别为心脏骤停而被排除。在其余的 519 个电话中,平均 TTFC 为 240 秒,在 MPDS 版本之间没有显著差异(p = 0.08)。

结论

在 MPDS 协议中删除了脉搏检查和 MTMV 的说明以及其他一些小的更改后,我们发现,在评估的三个版本中,整体 TTFC 为 240 秒,变化不大。与包括脉搏检查和 MTMV 说明的早期版本的 MPDS 报告相比,这代表了 TTFC 的改善(315 秒)。然而,MPDS 的 TTFC 与包括脉搏检查和 MTMV 的旧非 MPDS 协议的报告相比并不理想。应继续努力,重点提高这一关键且可改变的心脏骤停存活率决定因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验