Ambulance Victoria, Australia.
Resuscitation. 2012 Jan;83(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
CPR in patients in residential aged care facilities (RACF) deserves careful consideration. We examined the characteristics, management and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in RACF patients in Melbourne, Australia.
The Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry (VACAR) was searched for all OHCAs occurring in RACFs in Melbourne. The characteristics and outcomes were compared to non-RACF patients in the VACAR.
Between 2000 and 2009 there were 30,006 OHCAs, 2350 (7.8%) occurring in a RACF. A shockable rhythm was present in 179 (7.6%) patients on arrival of paramedics of whom bystander CPR had been performed in 118 (66%); 173 (97%) received an EMS attempted resuscitation. ROSC was achieved in 71 (41%) patients and 15 (8.7%) patients survived to leave hospital. Non shockable rhythm was present in 2171 patients (92%) of whom 804 (37%) had an attempted resuscitation by paramedics. ROSC was achieved in 176 patients (22%) and 10 patients (1.2%) were discharged alive. Survival from OHCA occurring in a RACF was less than survival in those aged >70 years of age who suffered OHCA in their own homes (1.8% vs. 4.7%, p=0.001). On multivariable analysis, witnessed OHCA (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4-3.7) and the presence of bystander CPR (OR 4.6, 95% CI 3.7-5.8) was associated with the paramedic decision to resuscitate.
Resuscitation of patients in RACF is not futile. However, informed decisions concerning resuscitation status should be made by patients and their families on entry to a RACF. Where it is appropriate to perform resuscitation, outcomes may be improved by the provision of BLS training and possibly AED equipment to RACF staff.
对居住在养老院(RACF)的患者进行心肺复苏术(CPR)需要仔细考虑。我们检查了澳大利亚墨尔本 RACF 患者院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的特征、管理和结局。
在维多利亚救护车心脏骤停登记处(VACAR)中搜索了所有在墨尔本 RACF 中发生的 OHCA。将这些特征和结局与 VACAR 中的非 RACF 患者进行比较。
2000 年至 2009 年间,VACAR 共记录了 30006 例 OHCA,其中 2350 例(7.8%)发生在 RACF。急救人员到达时,179 例(7.6%)患者存在可除颤节律,其中 118 例(66%)由旁观者进行了 CPR;173 例(97%)接受了 EMS 尝试复苏。71 例(41%)患者恢复自主循环,15 例(8.7%)患者存活出院。2171 例(92%)患者存在不可除颤节律,其中 804 例(37%)由急救人员尝试复苏。176 例(22%)患者恢复自主循环,10 例(1.2%)患者存活出院。在 RACF 中发生 OHCA 的患者的存活率低于在自己家中发生 OHCA 的年龄>70 岁患者的存活率(1.8%对 4.7%,p=0.001)。多变量分析表明,目击者 OHCA(OR 3.0,95%CI 2.4-3.7)和旁观者 CPR(OR 4.6,95%CI 3.7-5.8)与急救人员决定复苏有关。
对 RACF 患者进行复苏并非无效。然而,患者及其家属在入住 RACF 时应就复苏状态做出明智的决定。在适当的情况下,对 RACF 工作人员进行 BLS 培训并可能配备 AED 设备,可能会改善复苏结局。