MRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;40(5):1205-14. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr084. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
The mechanisms underlying the association between maternal age (both young and older maternal age) and adverse perinatal outcomes are unclear.
We examined the association of maternal age at first birth with preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) and small for gestational age (SGA) in a cohort of 264 695 Danish women, each of which had at least one sister in the cohort (n = 121 859 sibling groups). We compared cohort analyses with sister-controlled analyses. The sister-controlled analyses control for all observed and unobserved characteristics that are identical or very similar between sisters, such as childhood socio-economic characteristics-a confounder we hypothesized would exaggerate the young maternal age-adverse outcomes association but mask the older maternal age-adverse outcome association.
There was a U-shaped association of maternal age with risk of preterm birth (lowest risk age 24-30 years) and SGA (lowest risk age 26-30 years) in cohort analyses. In analyses with sister control, there was a J-shaped association of maternal age with preterm birth, with a monotonic increase in risk across the maternal age range from 24 years of maternal age. For SGA, risk increased across the age range in sister-controlled analyses, being lowest at age 15 years and highest at age 45 years (thought with wide confidence intervals at the extremes of the age distribution).
Our findings suggest that different mechanisms underlie the association of younger and older maternal age with adverse perinatal outcomes. Socio-economic position and other characteristics shared by sisters appear to explain most of the association of young maternal age with adverse perinatal outcomes, but the association of older maternal age with preterm birth, and SGA is not explained by this confounding and may even be masked by it.
母龄(包括年轻和高龄)与不良围产结局之间关联的机制尚不清楚。
我们在一个由 264695 名丹麦女性组成的队列中,研究了初产妇的年龄与早产(<37 孕周)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)之间的关系,其中每个女性在队列中至少有一个姐妹(n=121859 对姐妹组)。我们比较了队列分析和姐妹对照分析。姐妹对照分析控制了所有在姐妹之间相同或非常相似的观察到和未观察到的特征,如儿童社会经济特征——我们假设这一混杂因素会夸大年轻母亲年龄与不良结局之间的关联,但掩盖高龄母亲年龄与不良结局之间的关联。
在队列分析中,母亲年龄与早产(风险最低年龄 24-30 岁)和 SGA(风险最低年龄 26-30 岁)呈 U 型关联。在姐妹对照分析中,母亲年龄与早产呈 J 型关联,随着母亲年龄从 24 岁到整个年龄范围的增加,风险呈单调递增。对于 SGA,在姐妹对照分析中,风险在整个年龄范围内增加,在 15 岁时最低,在 45 岁时最高(虽然在年龄分布的极端值置信区间较宽)。
我们的研究结果表明,年轻和高龄母亲年龄与不良围产结局之间的关联可能有不同的机制。姐妹之间共享的社会经济地位和其他特征似乎解释了年轻母亲年龄与不良围产结局之间的大部分关联,但高龄母亲年龄与早产和 SGA 的关联不能用这种混杂因素来解释,甚至可能被其掩盖。