• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体-基台界面的封闭能力及扫描电子显微镜观察

Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface.

作者信息

Lorenzoni Fabio C, Coelho Paulo G, Bonfante Gerson, Carvalho Ricardo M, Silva Nelson R F A, Suzuki Marcelo, Silva Thelma Lopes, Bonfante Estevam A

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Integrated Center for Research, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 17012-901, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2011;2011:864183. doi: 10.1155/2011/864183. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1155/2011/864183
PMID:21754934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3132604/
Abstract

To evaluate the sealing capability of external hexagon implant systems and assess the marginal fit, two groups (n = 10 each) were employed: SIN (Sistema de Implantes Nacional, Brazil) and Osseotite, (Biomet 3i, USA). Sealing capability was determined by placing 0.7 μL of 1% acid-red solution in the implant wells before the torque of their respective abutments. Specimens were then placed into 2.5 mL vials filled with 1.3 mL of distilled water with the implant-abutment interface submerged. Three samples of 100 μL water were collected at previously determinate times. The absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer, and the data were analyzed by Two-way ANOVA (P < .05) and Tukey's test. Marginal fit was determined using SEM. Leakage was observed for both groups at all times and was significantly higher at 144 hrs. SEM analysis depicted gaps in the implant-abutment interface of both groups. Gaps in the implant-abutment interface were observed along with leakage increased at the 144 hrs evaluation period.

摘要

为评估外六角种植体系统的封闭能力并评估边缘适合性,采用了两组(每组n = 10):SIN(巴西国家种植体系统)和Osseotite(美国Biomet 3i)。在拧紧各自基台之前,通过在种植体窝内放置0.7μL 1%酸性红溶液来确定封闭能力。然后将标本放入装有1.3 mL蒸馏水的2.5 mL小瓶中,使种植体-基台界面浸没。在预先确定的时间收集三份100μL的水样。用分光光度计测量吸光度,并通过双向方差分析(P < 0.05)和Tukey检验对数据进行分析。使用扫描电子显微镜确定边缘适合性。两组在所有时间均观察到渗漏,且在144小时时显著更高。扫描电子显微镜分析显示两组种植体-基台界面均有间隙。在144小时评估期观察到种植体-基台界面存在间隙,同时渗漏增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/0ca336409a45/IJD2011-864183.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/ff6291ccb5dc/IJD2011-864183.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/8ffad57608d9/IJD2011-864183.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/eea09dd01502/IJD2011-864183.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/0ca336409a45/IJD2011-864183.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/ff6291ccb5dc/IJD2011-864183.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/8ffad57608d9/IJD2011-864183.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/eea09dd01502/IJD2011-864183.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/3132604/0ca336409a45/IJD2011-864183.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface.种植体-基台界面的封闭能力及扫描电子显微镜观察
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:864183. doi: 10.1155/2011/864183. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
2
Evaluation of UCLA implant-abutment sealing.UCLA 种植体-基台密封的评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):113-20. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3217.
3
Performance of different abutment/implant joints as a result of a sealing agent.不同基台/种植体连接界面在密封剂作用下的性能表现。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Oct 15;65(4):489-494. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00025. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
4
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
5
In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems.不同种植体系统种植体基台连接密封能力的体外评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):917-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01886.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
6
Effectiveness of Sealing Gel on Vertical Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface and Preload Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.密封胶对种植体-基台界面垂直不贴合的有效性和螺丝固位种植体支持修复体的预紧力维持。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):479-484. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7978.
7
The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.氧化锆或金属基台在种植体-基台界面上循环加载时的行为。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.三种种植体-陶瓷基台连接方式的边缘准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):537-43.
9
Sealing effectiveness against Staphylococcus aureus of five different implant-abutment connections.五种不同种植体-基台连接对金黄色葡萄球菌的封闭效果
Am J Dent. 2018 Jun;31(3):141-143.
10
In Vitro Comparison of Microbial Leakage of the Implant-Healing Abutment Interface in Four Connection Systems.四种连接系统中种植体-愈合基台界面微生物渗漏的体外比较
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Oct;45(5):350-355. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00311. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Fixture-Abutment Microgap in Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: An In Vitro Study.循环加载对短种植体与标准种植体中种植体-基台微间隙的影响:一项体外研究
Int J Dent. 2024 Dec 27;2024:4723112. doi: 10.1155/ijod/4723112. eCollection 2024.
2
Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant-Abutment Connection.种植体-基台连接处微间隙的显微CT评估
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;16(12):4491. doi: 10.3390/ma16124491.
3
Microgap and microleakage of a hybrid connection platform-switched implant system in the absence or presence of a silicone-based sealing agent.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface.种植体-基台界面间隙的影像学评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Aug;22(4):235-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00345.x.
2
In vitro microbiological bacterial seal analysis of the implant/abutment connection in morse taper implants: a comparative study between 2 abutments.体外微生物细菌密封分析莫氏锥度种植体种植体/基台连接:两种基台的对比研究。
Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):158-66. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cc48b1.
3
Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial.
混合连接平台切换种植体系统在有无硅基密封剂条件下的微间隙和微渗漏。
Odontology. 2022 Apr;110(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00652-x. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
种植体平台转换与边缘骨水平变化:一项随机对照临床试验的结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x.
4
Short-term bone level observations associated with platform switching in immediately placed and restored single maxillary implants: a preliminary report.即刻种植并修复的单颗上颌种植体中与平台转换相关的短期骨水平观察:初步报告
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):277-82.
5
A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss.一项评估平台转换技术预防修复后牙槽嵴骨吸收的随机前瞻性多中心试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):299-308.
6
In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems.不同种植体系统种植体基台连接密封能力的体外评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):917-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01886.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
7
Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants.平台转换种植体周围种植体周围骨吸收的评估。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Aug;28(4):347-55.
8
Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration.具有内部抗旋转结构的种植体-基台界面的边缘适合性和微间隙
Dent Mater J. 2008 Jan;27(1):29-34. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.29.
9
A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.种植体支持单冠5年生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):119-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
10
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.缺失牙修复干预措施:不同类型的牙种植体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub3.