• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体支持单冠5年生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。

A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.

作者信息

Jung Ronald E, Pjetursson Bjarni E, Glauser Roland, Zembic Anja, Zwahlen Marcel, Lang Niklaus P

机构信息

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):119-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
PMID:18067597
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications.

METHODS

An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on SCs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year proportions.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies from an initial yield of 3601 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. In a meta-analysis of these studies, survival of implants supporting SCs was 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.9-97.6%] after 5 years. The survival rate of SCs supported by implants was 94.5% (95% CI: 92.5-95.9%) after 5 years of function. The survival rate of metal-ceramic crowns, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.6-96.7%), was significantly (P=0.005) higher than the survival rate, 91.2% (95% CI: 86.8-94.2%), of all-ceramic crowns. Peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred adjacent to 9.7% of the SCs and 6.3% of the implants had bone loss exceeding 2 mm over the 5-year observation period. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.14%. After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of screw or abutment loosening was 12.7% and 0.35% for screw or abutment fracture. For supra-structure-related complications, the cumulative incidence of ceramic or veneer fractures was 4.5%.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that after an observation period of 5 years, high survival rates for implants and implant-supported SCs can be expected. However, biological and particularly technical complications are frequent.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估种植体支持的单冠(SCs)的5年生存率,并描述生物学和技术并发症的发生率。

方法

通过电子检索MEDLINE并辅以手工检索,以识别关于SCs的前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,平均随访时间至少为5年。使用随机效应泊松回归模型分析失败率和并发症发生率,以获得5年比例的汇总估计值。

结果

从最初的3601篇标题中最终筛选出26项研究并提取数据。在对这些研究的荟萃分析中,支持SCs的种植体5年后的生存率为96.8%[95%置信区间(CI):95.9 - 97.6%]。种植体支持的SCs在功能5年后的生存率为94.5%(95% CI:92.5 - 95.9%)。金属烤瓷冠的生存率为95.4%(95% CI:93.6 - 96.7%),显著高于全瓷冠的生存率91.2%(95% CI:86.8 - 94.2%)(P = 0.005)。在5年观察期内,9.7%的SCs邻近部位发生种植体周围炎和软组织并发症,6.3%的种植体骨吸收超过2 mm。5年后种植体骨折的累积发生率为0.14%。5年后,螺钉或基台松动的累积发生率为12.7%,螺钉或基台骨折的累积发生率为0.35%。对于上部结构相关并发症,陶瓷或贴面骨折的累积发生率为4.5%。

结论

可以得出结论,经过5年的观察期,种植体和种植体支持的SCs有望获得较高的生存率。然而,生物学并发症尤其是技术并发症很常见。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.种植体支持单冠5年生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):119-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
2
A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.对支持固定种植体修复的陶瓷和金属种植体基台性能的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:4-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x.
3
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).牙支持式固定义齿(FDPs)、种植体支持式FDPs及单冠(SCs)的生存率和并发症发生率比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
4
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.一项对固定局部义齿(FPDs)在至少5年观察期后的生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):625-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x.
5
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns.对全瓷和金属烤瓷修复体至少3年观察期后的生存率和并发症发生率进行的系统评价。第一部分:单冠修复。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:73-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01467.x.
6
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs.对观察期至少5年的固定局部义齿(FPD)的生存率和并发症发生率进行的系统评价。II. 联合牙-种植体支持的FPD
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):643-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x.
7
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses.对全瓷和金属烤瓷修复体在至少3年观察期后的生存率和并发症发生率进行的系统评价。第二部分:固定义齿。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:86-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x.
8
Outcome of implant therapy in patients with previous tooth loss due to periodontitis.既往因牙周炎导致牙齿缺失患者的种植治疗效果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:104-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01347.x.
9
A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.对至少5年的前瞻性纵向研究报告的种植义齿生物学和技术并发症发生率进行的系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x.
10
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years.一项关于至少5年观察期后带悬臂延伸的种植体支持固定义齿的生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):441-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01706.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Thermodynamic Cyclic Loading on Screw Loosening of Tightened Versus New Abutment Screw in Bone Level and Tissue Level Implants in DIO Implant Company (In-Vitro Study).热力学循环加载对DIO种植体公司骨水平和软组织水平种植体中拧紧的与新的基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70162. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70162.
2
Screw Coating as a Solution to Solve Screw Loosening Complications: An In Vitro Study.螺旋涂层作为解决螺钉松动并发症的一种方法:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;18(12):2921. doi: 10.3390/ma18122921.
3
Long-Term Benefits of Periodontal Regeneration in Severely Compromised Teeth: A Retrospective Case Series.
严重受损牙齿牙周组织再生的长期益处:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Case Rep Dent. 2025 Jun 16;2025:6925321. doi: 10.1155/crid/6925321. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating Complications, Success Rate, and Marginal Bone Loss in Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估骨水泥固位与螺丝固位的单颗种植体支持氧化锆全冠的并发症、成功率及边缘骨吸收:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 May 2;17(5):e83370. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83370. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Prospective clinical comparative evaluation of implant-supported zirconia-lithium disilicate bilayered ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.种植体支持的氧化锆-二硅酸锂双层陶瓷和金属陶瓷后牙修复体的前瞻性临床比较评估:3年随访
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;17(2):59-69. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.2.59. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
6
A Combined Approach Using Strip Grafts and Xenogenic Dermal Matrix for Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation in the Mandible: A Case Series.采用条状移植和异种真皮基质联合方法进行下颌种植体周围角化黏膜增量:病例系列
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 27;13(4):806. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040806.
7
The Decision Between Tooth Retention or Replacement with Implants: A Continuing Dilemma.牙齿保留还是种植牙修复的抉择:持续存在的困境
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;13(3):99. doi: 10.3390/dj13030099.
8
Impact of different abutment materials on peri-implant tissue health and esthetics in fixed prosthodontics.不同基台材料对固定修复中种植体周围组织健康和美学的影响。
Bioinformation. 2024 Oct 31;20(10):1340-1344. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001340. eCollection 2024.
9
Is root canal treatment and an indirect coronal restoration of a mandibular first molar cost-effective compared to extraction and an implant-supported crown? A decision analytic approach.与拔除下颌第一磨牙并进行种植体支持的牙冠修复相比,下颌第一磨牙的根管治疗和间接冠修复是否具有成本效益?一种决策分析方法。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Feb 27;84:95-103. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.42894.
10
Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study.影响种植体支持单冠螺钉稳定性的因素:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;18(3):506. doi: 10.3390/ma18030506.